What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 15, 2019 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad, even if in the final wing at the top you lose something because of a not perfect parallelism, unfortunately sometimes that is just the critical point, you do not always realize in the recovery phase. Non male, anche se in finale ala nella parte alta si perde qualche cosa per via di una parallelismo non perfetto, purtroppo a volte quello è proprio il punto critico, non sempre ci si rende conto in fase di ripresa. |
| sent on September 15, 2019 (15:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
True, Quoto Pigi, and I add that it seems to me a little too yellow both on the farfala, and in the background
A greeting
Andrea Vero, quoto Pigi, e aggiungo che a me pare un po' troppo giallina sia sulla farfala, sia sullo sfondo
Un saluto
Andrea |
| sent on September 16, 2019 (9:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
however the image as a whole is pleasant
bravo
hello
comunque sia nel suo insieme l'immagine è gradevole
bravo
ciao
Salvatore |
| sent on September 16, 2019 (11:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comments, I answer point by point for better readability:
-Tenoralways try to give a little "heat" to the image and, in fact, every now and then the WB slider slips me a little :-D :-D :-D ... However, unless there are obvious exaggerations, it's a little personal-flavored, doesn't it?
-For the parallelism: I tried to compose with the subject not quite central with respect to the axis perpendicular with the sensor, so I think that resides there problem... Solutions? (apart from further closing the diaphragm);
Grazie per i commenti, rispondo punto per punto per una migliore leggibilità:
-Tendenzialmente cerco sempre di dare un po' di "calore" all'immagine e, in effetti, ogni tanto lo slider del WB mi scivola un po'  ...però, a meno di evidenti esagerazioni, sta un po' a gusto personale no?
-Per il parallelismo: ho cercato di comporre con il soggetto non proprio centrale rispetto all'asse perpendicolare col sensore, per cui mi sa che risiede lì problema... soluzioni? (a parte chiudere ulteriormente il diaframma);
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
