What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 15, 2013 (22:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice I like it. Molto bella mi piace. |
| sent on January 15, 2013 (23:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Squadron, good time
hello Squadrone, bel momento
ciao |
| sent on January 16, 2013 (0:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, nice time again ... the "flock" is always an effect ... if you have them close to home, do not know how I envy you ... good ciao, bel momento ripreso... lo "stormo" fa sempre un suo effetto... se li hai vicino a casa, non sai quanto ti invidio... bravo |
| sent on January 16, 2013 (1:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all and an honor for me! ! !
Thank you :-) Grazie mille a tutti e un'onore per me ! ! !
Grazie  |
user579 | sent on January 16, 2013 (10:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Interesting combination of equipment .... question .. f holds at all points? Quality decays much? Interessante combinazione di attrezzatura....domanda..tiene l'af su tutti i punti?La qualità decade molto? |
| sent on January 16, 2013 (11:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Angelino84, then you're the first one I asked this question and I can hide that nn nn expected nothing else ;-)
Then with the firmware update Eos550d, gives you the chance to have a fast AF and very accurate even at f / 8.
With regard to the quality loses much, especially in details and crop the photo to crop is almost mixed with the colors "Plastic" cmq I think we all recoverable in PP, which I unfortunately nn I can do.
Anyway the same combination I can 5DMkIII with the same problem and lost a lot in the crop: fconfuso:
I do not know how to agree, cmq if anyone has any advice I'll be glad to hear them.
Thank you very much. Ciao Angelino84,allora sei il primo che mi fa questa domanda e nn posso nasconderti che nn aspettavo altro 
Allora con l'aggiornamento del firmware della Eos550d, ti da la possibilità di avere un AF velocissimo e molto preciso anche a f/8.
Per quanto riguarda la qualità perde tanto, sopratutto nei dettagli e nei crop,la foto al crop risulta quasi impastata e con i colori "Plastici" cmq credo si tutto recuperabile in PP,cosa che io purtroppo nn so fare.
Cmq la stessa combinazione la faccio con la 5DMkIII e da lo stesso problema perde un sacco nel crop 
Non so quanto possa convenire,cmq se qualcuno ha dei consigli sarò lieto di ascoltarli.
Grazie mille. |
user579 | sent on January 16, 2013 (12:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ As for the quality loses so much, especially in details and crop „
Ok, as I imagined ... ultimately I believe that the combination can make 100-400 + 1.4x decently only when the subject is close. For example, to shoot sparrows, when subjects are up to 5-6metri I think the results are much better. You should do some testing ... I think the problem of crop extends beyond certain distances (quantify) over which the detail is mixed. You could do a test on how you deal with distant subjects up to 10-15m ... and see if the results are good. Personally, I also happened recently to photograph shorebirds or passerines at distances within 10 meters, but being forced to crop a little because given their small size and the focal length of "only" 400mm cutting was not stRight as I wanted.
In cases like this, in my opinion better than the crop multiplier. Conversely, if the subject is distant, perhaps better crop than multiplication.
However, only conjecture, it would take a test to dot the "i".
To tighten:
test1
subject 10metres: without multiplier cropped in post by 40% (so as to bring it to 560mm)
with multiplier and subsequent reorganization to bring it to equal the previous one (for example 40D of from 10Mpx, the first shot after the crop will be approximately 6mpx and the second will always resized to 6mpx obviously without any crop).
test2
subject 30-40metri: as above.
" Per quanto riguarda la qualità perde tanto, sopratutto nei dettagli e nei crop"
Ok, come immaginavo...in definitiva io credo che l'abbinamento 100-400 + 1.4x possa rendere decentemente solo quando il soggetto è vicino. Ad esempio per fotografare i passeriformi, quando i soggetti sono al max a 5-6metri secondo me i risultati sono decisamente migliori. Bisognerebbe fare qualche prova...secondo me il problema dei crop sussiste oltre certe distanze (da quantificare) oltre le quali il dettaglio si impasta. Si potrebbe fare un test di come si comporta con soggetti distanti max 10-15metri...e vedere se i risultati sono buoni. Personalmente mi è capitato anche recentemente di fotografare dei limicoli o dei passeriformi a distanze entro i 10metri, essendo però costretto a croppare un pochino in quanto viste le loro dimensioni ridotte e la focale di "soli" 400mm il taglio non risultava stretto come volevo.
In casi come questo, secondo me meglio il moltiplicatore che non il crop. Viceversa se il soggetto è distante, forse meglio il crop che non la moltiplicazione.
Tuttavia sono solo congetture, ci vorrebbe un test per mettere i puntini sulle "i".
Per stringere:
test1
soggetto 10metri: senza moltiplicatore croppato in post del 40% (così da portarlo a 560mm)
con moltiplicatore e successivo ridimensionamento per portarla a pari della precedente (ad esempio su 40D da 10mpx, il primo scatto dopo il crop sarà circa 6mpx ed il secondo andrà ridimensionato sempre a 6mpx ovviamente senza alcun crop).
test2
soggetto 30-40metri: come sopra.
Da li si comparano i risultati e si valuta.
|
user579 | sent on January 16, 2013 (14:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For this shot I'm afraid of anything .... :-|:-D Per questo scatto temo a niente....  |
| sent on January 16, 2013 (14:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Count if I had to disassemble the duplicator No I did have time to take :-|
Anyway I guess I'll put it on sale ;-)
Conta se avessi dovuto smontare il duplicatore nn facevo in tempo a scattare
Cmq credo proprio che lo metterò in vendita
|
| sent on January 16, 2013 (20:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
really nice davvero bella |
user579 | sent on January 16, 2013 (23:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Anyway I guess I'll put it on sale „
Give me a whistle ... 8-) lately I do a lot of stuff close up, could make me comfortable:-D " Cmq credo proprio che lo metterò in vendita "
Fammi un fischio... ultimamente di roba ravvicinata ne faccio parecchia, potrebbe farmi comodo |
user579 | sent on January 16, 2013 (23:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ 100-400mm with extender 1.4x or Sigma 120-300mm f.2, 8 with 2x extender and 1.4x? that is the question (I'd already chosen) „
Tempter ...... 8-)
But right now I miss the money .. " 100-400mm con extender 1.4x o sigma 120-300mm f.2,8 con extender 2x e 1.4x? questo è il dilemma (io avrei già scelto) "
Diavolo tentatore......
Ma ora come ora mi mancano i denari.. |
| sent on May 11, 2013 (23:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very successful this dynamic photo! Molto riuscita questa dinamica foto! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
