What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 25, 2019 (8:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sharpness to sell Nitidezza da vendere |
| sent on July 25, 2019 (9:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well if the zoom to F6.3 goes so I would say that we are unemployed :-D .... I read in a thread that you also/you also had Canon, I'd like to hear your impressions Beh se lo zoom a F6.3 va così direi che siamo disoccupati ....Ho letto in un thread che hai/avevi anche Canon , mi piacerebbe sentire le tue impressioni |
| sent on July 25, 2019 (9:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great result with this pairing... beautiful even the light. good at Ottimo risultato con quest'accoppiata...bella anche la luce. Bravo |
| sent on July 25, 2019 (9:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great yield Panna (Lorenzo, right?), we are not at the levels of the supertele, of course; let's say you've got on 42mpx the yield that with the generation of previous zoommoni (like the tamron I had) you had on 18-20mpx. Ottima resa Panna (Lorenzo, giusto?), non siamo ai livelli dei supertele, ovviamente; diciamo che hai su 42mpx la resa che con la generazione di zoommoni precedenti (tipo il tamron che ho avuto) avevi su 18-20mpx. |
| sent on July 25, 2019 (9:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The yield is good, excellent on the big feathers, a hair less on the thinner ones of the head. That's where you play another championship with the prime lenses, in addition to the blurry and the great possibility of multiplying to shatter somewhat intrusive backgrounds. Overall it's a great lens that at relatively little price will make a big slice of photonaturalistic enthusiasts happy. It's bad you're otto trying the stuff, with the Sonari it's like fighting with Jehovah's Witnesses :-D La resa é buona, ottima sulle piume grosse, un pelo meno su quelle più sottili del capo. È li che si gioca un altro campionato con le lenti prime, oltre allo sfocato e la grande possibilità di moltiplicare per frantumare sfondi un pò invadenti. Nel complesso é un' ottima lente che a relativamente poco prezzo farà felicissima una grossa fetta di appassionati della fotonaturalistica. Meno male che ci sei tu Otto a provare la roba, con i Sonari é tipo combattere con i testimoni di Geova |
| sent on July 25, 2019 (14:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Roberto, without wanting to compete with sacred monsters that cost other figures, even those who have Sony today has an excellent native solution for photonaturalistic with more than dignified results. On the blurry, always related to the opening (a 600/4 is other...), we are instead at the top, they must have taken care of this detail a lot. Ps: some canons are perhaps worse!! :-D Grazie Roberto, senza voler appunto competere con mostri sacri che costano altre cifre, anche chi ha Sony oggi ha un'ottima soluzione nativa per fotonaturalistica con risultati più che dignitosi. Sullo sfocato, sempre relazionato all'apertura (un 600/4 è altro...), siamo invece al top, devono aver curato molto questo dettaglio. Ps: certi canonari sono forse peggio!! |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |