Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Portrait and Fashion

16.3 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Potrait 2 View gallery (10 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on December 28, 2012 (11:59) by Ravi. 6 comments, 807 views.

, 1/100 f/4.0, ISO 400, hand held.

no flash.

View High Resolution 16.3 MP

3 persons like it: Gazza71, Guidotti Claudio, Matley Siena

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Cridesign

sent on January 28, 2013 (10:44)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ciao Ravi, per lo scatto hai usato il 50ino?
Per la scelta dell'occhio è una cosa voluta? io avrei preferito vedere a fuoco l'altro occhio, non so, cosi l'immagine mi "stona".
Ma se il tuo intento era quello con me ha funzionato perfettamente :-P

.
Cristiano

Hello Ravi, for the shot you used 50ino?
For the choice of the eye is one thing desired? I would have preferred to see a fire the other eye, I do not know, so the image I "out of place".
But if your intent was with me it worked perfectly:-P.
Christian

Ravi	sent on January 28, 2013 (11:03) This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian) Click here to translate the comment in English Ho modificato i Dati Tecnici. ciao Cristiano. I edited the technical data. hello Christian. :-P

_richard

sent on January 29, 2013 (14:07)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Al di là della preferenza personale per l'altro occhio a fuoco, a dir la verità sembra sfocata "a mano" in PP...
Va bene l'obiettivo, ma... sembra ci sia dell'artifizio manuale...
Eeeek!!!

Beyond the personal preference for the other eye to focus, to be honest, looks blurred "by hand" in PP ...
Okay the goal, but ... there seems to be dell'artifizio manual ...
wow!

Ravi	sent on March 05, 2013 (1:53) This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian) Click here to translate the comment in English : Fconfuso:

Canonvicenza

sent on May 01, 2013 (19:19)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Di norma, va a fuoco sempre l occhio più vicino.....

As a rule, it should always focus the closer eye .....

user25123

sent on May 05, 2013 (23:41)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

...è una regola visiva. L'occhio a fuoco è sempre il più vicino. Ciò rende gradevole il ritratto. ;-)

LM

Is ... a visual rule. The eye focus is always the closest. This makes a pleasant portrait. ;-)
LM

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.