Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

12.2 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

macro e flora View gallery (3 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on December 27, 2012 (15:18) by Valentina Gob. 6 comments, 463 views.

at 55mm, 1/160 f/5.6, ISO 100, hand held.

View High Resolution 12.2 MP

2 persons like it: Francesco Iafelice, Stefano Coghene

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Roberto Marini

sent on December 28, 2012 (1:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

valentina as you'll see the head of the butterfly wing and half on fire. in these cases, if you want to set a butterfly or a flower you have to do to put the subject parallel to the machine, so 'you have the subject in focus, with 5.6 you have little depth of field. hello roberto

Valentina Gob

sent on December 28, 2012 (9:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Roberto! Thank you so much for your valuable advice. This is the problem I had in all those neighbors! Your really a good help! :-) Thank you!
Valentina.

Elleemme

sent on December 28, 2012 (22:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good maf eye.
The 18-55mm is a good lens to do some close-up. I agree that rather than a recovery in 3/4 was preferable to seek the parallelism between the sensor plane and the small body of the butterfly. With the Canon 1100 can push up to 200 and max 400 iso for this type of shooting 8-). Always sets the semi-automatic "Aperture Priority", set the ISO and choose the most appropriate aperture without risking shake ;-).
hello and good light with little wind, laurel

Valentina Gob

sent on December 29, 2012 (11:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Fantastico! Lauro, infinite thanks for this information! :-)
The world of macro fascinates me so much, I would take a new goal, but I am undecided between the Canon EF-S 55-250mm 4-5.6 IS II and the Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG, just to start.
You what would you recommend?

Elleemme

sent on December 29, 2012 (13:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Neither of them:-D. The best price / quality ratio, in my opinion, has the tamron 70-300mm vc usd with a real super f and a stabilizer of last generation. Excellent performance even at 300mm.
Later if you captivate the Tamron 90mm macro or the tokina 100mm f.2, 8.
Leggiti this my exhaustive testing:
www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&f=24&t=21616
Hello and good light, laurel

Valentina Gob

sent on December 30, 2012 (8:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

:-D oops! I had quite a selection apt really! :-)
Anyway I read your test, I also went to other sites to inform me and convinced me ;-) thanks a lot! Ciaoo!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.