JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on June 24, 2019 (13:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The maf was very uncertain and maybe the wind did not help. Tips: -use a single af and af-continuous point by dropping it on the butterfly -raises the iso to increase the shooting margins and freeze the move (imho) Hello, Lauro La maf è risultata molto incerta e forse il vento non ha aiutato. Consigli: -usa un solo punto af e af-continuo facendolo cadere sulla farfalla -alza gli iso per aumentare i margini di ripresa e congelare il mosso (imho) Ciao, Lauro
sent on June 24, 2019 (15:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ The maf was very uncertain and maybe the wind did not help. Tips: -use a single af and af-continuous point by dropping it on the butterfly -raises the iso to increase the shooting margins and freeze the move (imho) „
Hello Lauro and thanks for the advice. Mainly I always use the single point for the af, instead I'm not used to using the af-continuous and it's a function that I always forget to set. I took this picture while resting in a field after a trek. I could see these butterflies fluttering, since I had the 70-300 in my backpack I wanted to try. Next time, I will definitely consider your advice. Hello, Luke " La maf è risultata molto incerta e forse il vento non ha aiutato. Consigli: -usa un solo punto af e af-continuo facendolo cadere sulla farfalla -alza gli iso per aumentare i margini di ripresa e congelare il mosso (imho)"
Ciao Lauro e grazie dei consigli.
Principalmente uso sempre il punto singolo per l'af, invece non sono abituato a usare l'af-continuo ed è una funzione che mi dimentico sempre di impostare.
Ho fatto questa foto mentre riposavo in un campo dopo un trekking. Vedevo svolazzare queste farfalle, visto che avevo il 70-300 nello zaino ho voluto provare. La prossima volta, terrò sicuramente in considerazione i tuoi consigli.
sent on June 24, 2019 (17:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The continuous af, if you do not lose the subject, works like a body-gard that holds the connection with the subject this because the photographer while shooting may not notice to bascular with the body then to continuously move the point of af and the subject (here the flower) could sway due to the slight breeze (another cause of af not hooked) .... let's remember that there are some millimeters of pdc ;-) at stake L'af continuo, se non si perde il soggetto, funziona al pari di un body-gard che tiene il collegamento con il soggetto questo perchè il fotografo mentre scatta può non accorgersi di basculare con il corpo quindi di spostare di continuo il punto di af e il soggetto (qui il fiore) potrebbe ondeggiare causa la leggera brezza (altra causa di af non agganciato) .... ricordiamoci che in gioco ci sono alcuni di millimetri di pdc
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
