JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on June 23, 2019 (19:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Some problems are palpable: -slope on the left -diffraction (loss of yield due to the diaphragm value too closed) -noise (ball iso) -underexposure (multiplys noise and makes plumage difficult) Tips: - always use 1 point of af and ai-servo - the 4th value at stake is the deviation of the exposure (key to/-), make the most of it ... on this occasion it was preferable to overexpose at least 2/3 of stop reserving if anything to underexpose a hair in pp - iso ... vary from time to time (imho) hello, lauro Sono palpabili alcuni problemi: -pendenza a sinistra -diffrazione (perdita di resa a causa del valore di diaframma troppo chiuso) -rumorosità (iso a palla) -sottoesposizione (moltiplica il rumore e rende poco leggibile il piumaggio) Consigli: - usa sempre 1 solo punto di af e ai-servo + priorità di diframma - il 4° valore in gioco è la deviazione dell'esposizione (tasto +/-), sfruttalo di più ... in questa aoccasione era preferibile sovraesporre almeno di 2/3 di stop riservandoci semmai di sottoesporre un pelino in pp - iso ...variali di volta in volta (imho) ciao, lauro
sent on June 23, 2019 (19:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you. It's hard to vary from time to time. The scenes change constantly fast. It's not a zoo, it's a huge park. Grazie. E' difficile variare di volta in volta. Le scene cambiano di continuo velocemente. Non è uno zoo, è un parco immenso.
sent on June 23, 2019 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is a double-dial reflex (one for diaphragm and the rear reflex for exposure) and makes control much faster. Is are set to safety but must be modified depending on the situation. For that optics at most closes to f.9 - The reflex does not know what we frame and what we want to emphasize ... us you ;-) - always (imho) Hello, lauro E' una reflex con doppia ghiera (una per diaframma e quella posteriore per l'esposizione) e rende molto più rapido il controllo . Gli iso si impostano di sicurezza ma devono essere modificabili a seconda della situazione. Per quell'ottica al massimo si chiude a f.9 - La reflex non sa che cosa inquadriamo e cosa vogliamo enfatizzare ...noi si - sempre (imho) Ciao, lauro
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
-