RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Sirfide...

Macrofoto2

View gallery (53 photos)

Sirfide sent on June 20, 2019 (12:19) by Pablo46. 5 comments, 258 views. [retina]

, 1/200 f/16.0, ISO 250, hand held.




View High Resolution 10.2 MP  

2 persons like it: Infas, Larissa71


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on June 20, 2019 (13:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

we are a little far from a macro
you notice the micromove and the background noise is high
the focus to improve
however a good one deserves it all
hello
Salvator


avatarsupporter
sent on June 20, 2019 (15:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

To what has already been written I add that the brightness is a little high, a sign of an exposure not quite correct, in addition I would have placed the subject more to the right of the observer.

avatarsenior
sent on June 20, 2019 (17:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


We are a little far from a macro
you notice the micromove and the background noise is high
the focus to improve

The shot was performed freehand, that there is micromove I agree. Apart from that the "macro" section also includes close-ups, how do you say that a photo is not a macro (real subject size ratio and its size in the sensor at least 1:1) if you do not know the size of the sirfide? Thank you anyway for the comment, punctual and polite.

avatarsenior
sent on June 20, 2019 (17:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


To what has already been written I add that the brightness is a little high, a sign of an incorrect exposure, plus I would have placed the subject more to the right of the observer.

The brightness may also depend on the calibration of the monitor, regardless of the exposure, as to the positioning of the subject in a more central position, I could then receive the observation that the shot did not obey the "rule of thirds!, so "quot understands, tot sententiae"....

avatarsupporter
sent on June 20, 2019 (19:19)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


" La luminosità può dipendere anche dalla calibrazione del monitor"

Se non avessi un monitor calibrato non mi sentirei di fare simili osservazioni, si nota molto bene che la luminosità sul soggetto sia piuttosto dura, comunque nulla di male l'importante è che tu sia contento e soprattutto convinto.

" , quanto al posizionamento del soggetto in posizione più centrale, avrei potuto ricevere poi l'osservazione che lo scatto non obbediva alla "regola dei terzi!"

Ma nessuno ha scritto che il soggetto andava posizionato centralmente, ma semplicemente posizionato più a destra. Esiste anche il primo terzo superiore di destra.

Visto che Salvatore non è subentrato penso di risponderti al suo posto solo per chiarire.
Quando dice che siamo un po' lontano da una macro, non era inteso che questa avrebbe dovuto essere una foto con minimo un rapporto 1:1 altrimenti ben poche delle nostre foto potrebbero essere inserite in questa sezione, va da se che s'intendono anche quelle denominate close up. Il problema nasce dal fatto che in linea di massima le foto hanno una discreta lettura e magari con meno errori. Non devi prenderla sul personale i suggerimenti che vengono dati sono solo atti a far si che tutti noi si possa migliorare.



RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me