What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user28555 | sent on May 29, 2019 (10:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad for the non-resident lens and accessory in use even if you can not expect miracles on definition and sharpness with parameters in my opinion unbalanced both on the side of shutter speed (at risk Microblur) and consequent to a diaphragm Excessively/unnecessarily closed (a single central point F11 and selective MAF, Max F13 I think it was enough and advanced) with the dfference that you could have reduced Iso aal optimum value 100 or 125 with greater overall quality and greater detail and definition and Especially a shutter time around 1/400 or 1/500 as a speed with obvious benefits to defuse or contain at least the risk of micro-shake freehand :-) (Disquisizone of General order and only opinion Personaloe Mario, without commitment, good anyway the naturalistic photo and close up of the small insect, never easy to grasp and represent) ;-): Bravo Mario.
Hello, Claudio :-P Non male per la lente non specializzta ed accessorio in uso anche se non si possono pretendere miracoli su definizione e nitidezza con parametri a mio avviso squilibrati sia sul versante del tempo di scatto (a rischio micromosso) e conseguente ad un diaframma eccessivamente/inutilmente chiuso (un F11 a punto centrale singolo e maf selettiva, max F13 credo bastasse ed avanzasse) con la dfferenza che avresti potuto ridurre gli Iso aal valore ottimale 100 o 125 con maggior qualita' complessiva e maggior dettaglio e definizione e sopratutto un tempo di otturazione intorno ad 1/400 o 1/500 come velocita' con benefici evidenti per disinnescare o contenere ai minimi termini il rischio di micromosso a mano libera (disquisizone di ordine generale e solo parere personaloe Mario, senza impegno, buona comunque la foto naturalistica e close up del piccolo insetto, mai facile da cogliere e rappresentare) : bravo Mario.
Ciao, Claudio |
| sent on May 30, 2019 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Claudio you are always very kind. Good night Grazie Claudio sei sempre molto gentile. Buonanotte |
| sent on May 31, 2019 (11:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations, really a nice Macro. I also would have used a diaphragm less closed, but not F11, at least F16. Anyway, you took a nice picture. I wanted to get more into the technical specifications of aperture choice, but I saw that Claudio was very exhaustive in the matter.
A greeting, Alessandro Complimenti,davvero una bella Macro.Anche io avrei usato un diaframma meno chiuso,ma non f11,almeno f16.Comunque,hai scattato una bella foto.Avrei voluto entrare di piu nelle specifiche tecniche della scelta del diaframma,ma ho visto che Claudio è stato molto esaustivo in materia.
Un saluto,Alessandro |
| sent on May 31, 2019 (23:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, too, Alessandro. I'll treasure it for the next macro Grazie anche a te Alessandro. Ne farò tesoro per la prossima macro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
