What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user28347 | sent on May 08, 2019 (10:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice clean file without noise, I would have done a square cut by cutting right molto bello il file pulito senza rumore,avrei fatto un taglio quadrato tagliando a destra |
| sent on May 08, 2019 (20:54) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (11:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful photo and the D5 never ceases to amaze...
Hello
Marco Bella foto e la D5 non finisce mai di stupire...
Ciao
Marco |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (11:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Marco... obviously there's PP but to file worked the color hold allows miracles Grazie Marco... ovviamente c'è PP ma a file lavorato la tenuta del colore permette miracoli |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (11:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Blade, this photo is to be shown to all those who say that the 51200 iso are of no use and rather than shoot give up the shot. :-o
To all those who have NEVER gone to photograph sporting events in suburban gyms, illuminated by 4 neon cross . ;-) Grazie Blade , questa foto è da far vedere a tutti quelli che dicono che i 51200 iso non servono a nulla e piuttosto che scattare rinunciano allo scatto.
A tutti quelli che non sono MAI andati a fotografare eventi sportivi in palestre di periferia, illuminate da 4 neon in croce .  |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (12:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bravo perfect summary I couldn't have said better.... of course some might object that to have a 300 2.8 you could shoot it at 12800, but this is also another point to emphasize, first point the versatility that with a simple CT you have, as opposed to a heavy and not versatile 300 fixed, 2, the cost, as if everyone can spend thousand euros x a 300 2.8, that's why I prefer preforming machines with high iso that allow you to use darker optics and more closed diaphragms on the same conditions, as if then diaphragm 5.6/8 them use only with sun... . Well.... Bravo riassunto perfetto non avrei potuto dirlo meglio.... certo qualcuno potrebbe obbiettare che ad aver un 300 2.8 la si poteva scattare a 12800, ma anche questo è un altro punto da sottolineare, punto primo la versatilità che con un semplice TC si ha, al contrario di un pesante e poco versatile 300 fisso, 2, il costo, come se tutti possono spendere mila euro x un 300 2.8, ecco perchè prediligo macchine preformanti ad alti iso che permettono di usare ottiche più buie e diaframmi più chiusi a parità di condizioni, come se poi diaframma 5,6/8 li uso solo con il sole .... vabbè .... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
