JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on March 25, 2019 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice idea ;-) I'd see it better rotated by 180 degrees :-) What equipment Did you use? Hello Bella idea la vedrei meglio ruotata di 180 gradi Che attrezzatura hai utilizzato? Ciao
sent on March 25, 2019 (17:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks a lot, I used a Sinar optical bench with 8x10 inch optical plate 180mm at F/64 with a 1 minute exposure about due to the MAF draw Grazie mille, ho usato un banco ottico Sinar con lastra 8x10 pollici ottica 180mm a f/64 con un esposizione di 1 minuto circa dovuto al tiraggio di maf
sent on March 25, 2019 (18:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the info... I admit that it is material unknown to me 8-) You never stop learning :-) Grazie per le info ... ammetto che è materiale a me sconosciuto non si smette mai di imparare
sent on March 26, 2019 (17:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
QUOTAS Sestri1970 „ is "OLD SCHOOL" Photography when it still was worthy of being called such... Not that now is less, in fact... Digital is a big step forward for many things, but for these photos, studied requiring absolute precision, as far as I am concerned the dear old optical bench is still the best choice, not least the fact that the negative is so large (20.3 x 25.4 cm for the Accuracy) that you can play as you want in the darkroom... Obviously to post it alas I had to meet the digital scan that makes losing a little ' quality and essence of the image itself! ^_^ " Sestri1970" è Fotografia "VECCHIA SCUOLA" quando ancora era degna di essere chiamata tale... non che ora sia da meno, anzi... il digitale è un grande passo avanti per molte cose, ma per queste foto, studiate che richiedono precisione assoluta, per quanto mi riguarda il caro vecchio banco ottico è ancora la scelta migliore, non per ultimo il fatto che il negativo è talmente grande (20.3 x 25.4 cm per l'esattezza) che puoi giocarci come vuoi in camera oscura... ovviamente per postarla ahimé ho dovuto sopperire alla scansione digitale che fa perdere un po' di qualità e di essenza dell'immagine in se ! ^_^
sent on March 26, 2019 (18:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I ask you an additional info: F/64 is the maximum closure that can reach the optics you used? How many mm. Is it the front lens? Diffraction with a diaphragm so closed? Thank You very much ;-) Hello :-) Ti chiedo un ulteriore info: f/64 è la chiusura massima che può raggiungere l'ottica che hai utilizzato? Quanti mm. è la lente frontale? Riscontri diffrazione con un diaframma così chiuso? Grazie mille Ciao
sent on July 22, 2019 (18:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry if I answer late I was absent from the hole :-P anyway the lens used was a 240mm that on the optical bench slab equals about 32 mm for FX the optics quietly closes up to f/138 but then with the slab you have reciprocity problems. Good light Scusa se rispondo in ritardo sono stato assente dal foro :-P comunque la lente usata era un 240mm che su lastra di banco ottico equivale a circa 32 mm per FX l'ottica chiude tranquillamente fino a f/138 ma poi con la lastra hai problemi di reciprocità. Buona luce