What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 09, 2019 (20:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice.
Clean and precise.
Congratulations. Molto bella.
Pulita e precisa.
Complimenti. |
| sent on February 09, 2019 (23:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, it would still deserve a little bit of integration.. It would be nice to pull out IC 2118 in Eridano :-) Molto bella , meriterebbe ancora un po' di integrazione.. sarebbe bello tirare fuori IC 2118 in Eridano  |
| sent on February 10, 2019 (9:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the steps
@Canopo70 would the witch Head Nebula? I ask you, next to the Rosetta Nebula, what is that red stain, on Stellarium I'm not at all, are they just gas formations? Grazie dei passaggi
@Canopo70 sarebbe la nebulosa testa di strega? Ti chiedo, vicino alla nebulosa Rosetta che cosè quella macchia rossa, su stellarium non mi da nulla, sono solo formazioni gassose? |
| sent on February 10, 2019 (9:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Isn't the area area of the nebula cone always in unicorn?
Searched for maybe NGC 2264 Non è la zona zona della nebulosa Cono sempre in Unicorno?
Cercato forse ngc 2264 |
| sent on February 10, 2019 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As indicated by Canopo70, it is the complex of the Cone Nebula (Cone Nebula + Christmas Tree cluster) Come indicato da Canopo70, è il complesso della nebulosa Cono (Cone Nebula + Christmas Tree cluster) |
| sent on February 10, 2019 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks guys, found it on stellarium even if it does not see any nebula sometimes do not understand why stellarium on certain nebulae does not show Grazie ragazzi, lo trovata su stellarium anche se non fa vedere nessuna nebulosa a volte non capisco perchè Stellarium su certe nebulose non le fa vedere |
| sent on February 10, 2019 (10:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well Stellarium is quite limited.
If you use Windows I recommend you skysafari on Bluestacks. Beh Stellarium è abbastanza limitato.
Se usi Windows io ti consiglio SkySafari su BlueStacks. |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (11:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I guess the witch is off the field to the right.... mi sa che la strega è fuori campo a dx.... |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (13:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me it's in the field.. It's near Rigel :-) per me è in campo.. è vicino Rigel |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's perfectly inside the field.
very difficult to resume at these focal though. È perfettamente dentro il campo.
Molto difficile da riprendere a queste focali però. |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (16:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I checked on the stellarium should be here:
[IMG]http://i65.tinypic.com/2isvyqf.jpg [/IMG]
and looking good maybe you glimpse something
Ho controllato sullo stellarium dovrebbe trovarsi qua:
e guardando bene forse si intravede qualcosa
|
| sent on February 12, 2019 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact I had caught last year I found the image:
[IMG]http://i68.tinypic.com/10dxnhu.jpg [/IMG] Anzi in realtà l'avevo beccata l'anno scorso ho ritrovato l'immagine:
|
| sent on February 12, 2019 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's just that :-) near Rigel è proprio quella vicino a Rigel |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (17:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
According to me this year is out of range right Secondo me quest'anno è fuori campo proprio |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (17:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think there is.. And it's between Rigel and those two little stars that create a triangle...
But anything can happen Secondo me c'è .. e si trova tra Rigel e quelle due stelline un po più evidenti che creano un triangolo...
però tutto può succedere |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But it's not that "we think there is"... The field framed includes it without a shadow of a doubt.
[IMG]https://i.postimg.cc/qBtSgcfw/Orione.jpg [/IMG]
Ma non è che "secondo noi c'è"... il campo inquadrato la include senza ombra di dubbio.
|
| sent on February 12, 2019 (21:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Calculate that the two images are of different focal I think that where you see the witch is with a 50 mm the other with a 24 mm, so there's dentro....ma you don't see Calcolate che le due immagini sono di focale diversa credo che quella in cui si vede la strega sia con un 50 mm l'altra con un 24 mm, quindi c'è dentro….ma non si vede |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of course you do not see, but, as you have rightly pointed out, only because of the focal and reduced integration. The field framed includes it for sure. Just trivially do an astrometric reduction, not necessary anyway, since the paper I posted in the overlay escape any doubt. Actually, I had no doubts about it. ;) Certo che non si vede, ma, come hai giustamente fatto notare, solo per via della focale e della ridotta integrazione. Il campo inquadrato la include di sicuro. Basta banalmente fare una riduzione astrometrica, non necessaria comunque, visto che la carta che ho postato in sovrapposizione fuga ogni dubbio. A dire il vero dubbi in realtà non ne avevo. ;) |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Neither do I.. I know that field well:) Neanche io .. conosco bene quel campo :) |
| sent on February 13, 2019 (8:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quotas But it is not that "we think there is „
:-D :-D " Ma non è che "secondo noi c'è"
 |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
