What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 06, 2019 (15:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mine is just a personal opinion, where I prefer a little more the presence of the background, but have more sharpness on the subject, especially if it is so complex, but as said are personal tastes. Il mio è solo un parere personale, dove preferisco un po' più la presenza dello sfondo, ma avere più nitidezza sul soggetto, specie se è così complesso, ma come detto sono gusti personali. |
| sent on February 06, 2019 (16:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comment, Pigi47. Yes, that's true. It's a very complex flower. Freehand, and with a little wind that he was pulling, I couldn't get down to 1/500. But I would close the diaphragm two or three stops, and raise the ISO. Maybe up to 800 wasn't too much of a stretch. And it's a pity because with all the needles within the PDC would definitely be a more effective fotopzu. ... wrong you learn... The blurry background I like, but always in hindsight, I realize I was wrong even the PDR. Taken at 180 ° exact, maybe I would have found a different color background. On that yellow-orange wall the red and yellow needles stand out little.
Thanks again and a dear greeting
Charles Grazie del commento, Pigi47. Sì è vero. É un fiore molto complesso. A mano libera, e con un po' di vento che tirava, non potevo scendere sotto a 1/500. Ma avrei chiudere il diaframma di due o tre stop, e alzare gli iso. Magari fino a 800 non sgranava troppo. Ed è un peccato perché con tutti gli aghi entro la pdc sarebbe stata sicuramente una fotopzu più efficace. ...sbagliando si impara... lo sfondo sfocato a me piace, ma sempre col senno di poi, mi rendo conto di aver sbagliato anche il pdr. Preso a 180° esatti, magari avrei trovato uno sfondo di colore diverso. Su quel muro giallo-arancio gli aghi rossi e gialli risaltano poco.
Grazie ancora ed un caro saluto
Carlo |
| sent on February 06, 2019 (16:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I should have closed...... a more effective picture... Scusa gli errori del T9... avrei dovuto chiudere... ...una foto più efficace... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
