JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 05, 2012 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, I took 2 photos in different exposures and then I teamed up to create an extended range (using software) and then reprocess all with photoshop using some parameters in the section dedicated hdr. It 's the first time I do this so I would say I'm pretty confused = S. I just proposed in comment area to have different opinions!
Niko ^ ^ ciao, ho scattato 2 foto a esposizioni differenti e poi le ho unite per creare una gamma estesa (utilizzando un software) per poi rielaborare il tutto con photoshop utilizzando alcuni parametri dedicati nella sezione hdr. E' la prima volta che faccio questa cosa quindi direi che sono abbastanza disorientato =S. L'ho appunto proposto in area commento per avere diversi pareri!
sent on December 05, 2012 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello here you are insufficient for tonal range and accordingly then the job is canceled. then you have to shoot in RAW make at least three shots at different exposures to 0 +2-2 if you can make it even 5 with a 1-f better. iso low apertures, only time will vary. then join them with Photomatix Pro and make the first parameter processing, TIFF and then save rework if possible with NEK is the best. Always save in tiff. Web only steps to jpg. so you can already see the difference technique. good light hello ;-) ciao qui sei insufficiente per gamma tonale e di conseguenza poi il lavoro si annulla. allora devi scattare in RAW fare almeno tre scatti con esposizioni diverse a 0+2-2 se riesci a farne anche 5 con variazioni di 1 f meglio. iso bassi, diaframmi chiusi, variare solo il tempo. poi unirli con Photomatix pro e fare la prima elaborazione dei parametri, salvare in tiff e poi rielaborarla se possibile con NEK è il migliore. salvare sempre in tiff. solo per web passi a jpg. gia così potrai vedere la differenza tecnica. buona luce ciao
sent on December 05, 2012 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
sisi fact I shoot in raw! I tried to do 2 shots because I saw that many people use only 2 exposures (although when shooting I was a bit puzzled by what I had in mind to do XD). The software I used is the same one you mentioned!. More later try again and will post the shots following your advice!. thank you very much the comment!
Niko ^ ^ sisi infatti ho scattato in raw! ho provato a fare 2 scatti perchè ho visto che diversi utenti usano solo 2 esposizioni (anche se durante gli scatti ero un po perplesso di quello che avevo in mente di fare XD). Il software che ho usato è lo stesso che hai citato!. Piu avanti riproverò e posterò degli scatti seguendo i tuoi consigli!. grazie mille del commento!