Butterfly Wing | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Join JuzaPhoto!

A A ? HELP SEARCH

Galleries
Macro and Flora

Resize to fit window

6.0 MEGAPIXEL

Macro in "studio" View gallery (8 photos)

Butterfly Wing sent on 02 Febbraio 2019 (14:04) by Pier 99. 5 comments, 624 views.

, 0.6 sec f/8.0, ISO 200, tripod.

Ci riprovo, stesse foto ma altra elaborazione. RR circa 3:1 di un'ala di Hipparchia fagi. Pentax 50mm invertito su circa 110mm di tubi di prolunga, stacking di 15 scatti su slitta autocostruita.

View High Resolution 6.0 MP

2 persons like it: Gabriele Cavagna, Louis-cyphre

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Faitu

sent on 03 Febbraio 2019 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello,
Maybe the effect of diffraction has become appreciable (I exclude the shake seen the use of the tripod), keep in mind that by increasing the ratio of reproduction, the actual diaphragm, for the purpose of diffraction, increases accordingly. Maybe try opening at F4.

Pier 99

sent on 03 Febbraio 2019 (13:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the advice!

Gandy

sent on 03 Febbraio 2019 (19:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

For me it has improved ;-)

Pigi47

sent on 04 Febbraio 2019 (9:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As mentioned previously with the equipment used and a FS is not simple, the new machining has better highlighted the details

Pier 99

sent on 04 Febbraio 2019 (14:30) | This comment has been translated

Thank you!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.