What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 25, 2019 (18:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Dear Mr. Vnosek,
This portrait is a marvellous work!
It's possible finding a unique and very particular taste and not obviously the only correct metering or beauty of model.
This, IMHO, is a rare case where the shot feel more natural thanks to the genious...
the "Maîtrise des compétences" of the author.
Sincerely...,
Ben-G dear mr. Vnosek ,
this portrait is a marvellous work!
It's possible finding a unique and very particular taste and not obviously the only correct metering or beauty of model.
This, imho, is a rare case where the shot feel more natural thanks to the genious...
the "maîtrise des compétences" of the author.
Sincerely...,
Ben-G |
| sent on January 27, 2019 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The model is very beautiful and has a smile that turns on the image, but I do not understand why you have dropped the fire on the hair instead of the eyes :-P
A greeting and a good Sunday.
Raffaele La modella è molto bella e ha un sorriso che accende l'immagine, ma non capisco perchè tu abbia fatto cadere il fuoco sui capelli anzichè sugli occhi 
Un saluto ed una buona domenica.
Raffaele |
| sent on January 27, 2019 (17:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
[(@Raffaele1978) "... but I do not understand why you have dropped the fire on the hair instead of the eyes..."]
Among the different qualities... it's properly this "unusual" traslation from a canonical focus zone, the eyes of subject, to a surprisingly and dialectical dimension respect to the frame axiality where the overpriced estabilish their communicative force in the whole Work design.
It's more than Botticelli Docet...
Here, at the first, when you seeking the eyes...
par même,
Mr. Vnosek,
Chapeau!
Ben-G
Among the different qualities (most of them into post image production)...it's properly this "unusual" traslation from a canonical focus zone, the eyes of subject, to a surprisingly and dialectical dimension respect to the frame axiality where the hairs estabilish their communicative force in the whole work design.
It's more than Botticelli docet...
Here it's a veiled and subtle negation,
an anti-academic refined critical attitude of the author.
Here, at the first, ... when we "seeking the eyes".
par même,
mr. Vnosek,
chapeau!
Ben-G |
| sent on November 20, 2020 (14:24)
When the eyes are clearly unfocused, the person who see the photo understand immediatly, there is no doubt. Here, that's not the case. When I've seen the photo, just like Raffaele I've been asking myself questions: what does the photographer want to show us? where does he want to take us? Is this relatively unfocused an error? is it done with intent? ...
If the reader has questions, it's because there's a problem. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
31.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
