JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on January 21, 2019 (11:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think the reflection on the subject would be observed even before the shot, then to attenuate it would have suffected a simple sheet of white paper or the limit shade with the only hand, eventually you would have recovered the eventual loss of brightness Compensating the exposure or at a later time in pp. The light could have already been sufficient using a slower time even in the presence of a bit of wind considering the static of the subject. Personally I would not have also closed the diaphragm so much, I imagine that F14/16 had been more than enough Penso che il riflesso sul soggetto si sarebbe osservato anche prima dello scatto, quindi per attenuarlo sarebbe bastato un semplice foglio di carta bianco o al limite ombreggiare con la sola mano, eventualmente avresti poi recuperato l'eventuale perdita di luminosità compensando l'esposizione o in un secondo tempo in pp. La luce avrebbe potuto essere già sufficiente utilizzando un tempo più lento anche in presenza di un po' di vento considerando la staticità del soggetto. Personalmente non avrei altresì chiuso così tanto il diaframma, immagino che f14/16 fosse stato più che sufficiente
sent on January 21, 2019 (14:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the complete and constructive commentary. It is what I expect when I place some rare shot knowing departing that are very far from perfection. I will keep your advice in the future. Hello Grazie per il completo e costruttivo commento. È quello che mi aspetto quando posto qualche raro scatto sapendo in partenza che sono molto lontani dalla perfezione.Terrò presente i tuoi consigli in futuro. Ciao
sent on January 21, 2019 (18:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What you have already said is all right! For the rest is worth the speech of the tripod made in the previous macro. still remains a good macro! It is clear that in photography no one has the exact science, much less I, take everything as the advice of a friend who began to photograph a few years before you! Hello and to soon, Giorgio Quanto ti hanno già detto è tutto esatto! Per il resto vale il discorso del cavalletto fatto nella precedente macro. Comunque rimane una buona macro! E' chiaro che in fotografia nessuno ha la scienza esatta, tanto meno io, prendi tutto come i consigli di un amico che ha incominciato a fotografare qualche anno prima di te! Ciao e a presto, Giorgio
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
