What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 19, 2019 (20:37) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on January 20, 2019 (8:36) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on January 23, 2019 (0:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A nice mess with a infiltrated :-D I think I wouldn't go over F8 Un bel caos con un infiltrato  a mio avviso non andrei oltre f8 |
| sent on January 23, 2019 (1:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a great show and PDR!
Hello Che spettacolo e ottima pdr!
Ciao |
| sent on January 23, 2019 (1:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a great show and PDR!
Hello Che spettacolo e ottima pdr!
Ciao |
| sent on January 23, 2019 (8:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You're right, Cinzia. At first I had also included boats that were behind the main subject and then I did not decrease the diaphragm. I always tend to exaggerate with the diaphragm forgetting that I work with the M4/3. I saw that you also use the Olympus system: Can you give me some other suggestions? Hai ragione Cinzia. All'inizio avevo incluso anche delle barche che si trovavano dietro il soggetto principale e poi non ho diminuito il diaframma. Tendo sempre ad esagerare con il diaframma dimenticando che lavoro con il m4/3. Ho visto che anche tu usi il sistema olympus: mi puoi dare qualche altro suggerimento? |
| sent on January 23, 2019 (20:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Let's say that with Olympus the best is from F 5.6 to F8. .. At Max F11, then it depends on the goals you have, learn to exhibit on DX and you can also push 2 stop and recover in post, while you tend to underexpose you have to be careful with the M10 (I miss my M10 Silver first model).. To Noise in the shadows (manageable up to 1600 ISO).. For the rest I leave everything to 0, for AF.. I had that 3-axis single-point center. Exposure almost always weighted average.. or spot... Diciamo che con olympus il meglio è da f 5.6 a F8. ..al max f11,poi dipende dagli obbiettivi che hai,impara ad esporre a dx e puoi spingerti anche di 2 stop e recuperare in post,mentre se tendi a sottoesporre devi stare attento con la m10 (mi manca la mia m10 argento primo modello )..al rumore nelle ombre (gestibile fino a 1600 iso)..per il resto io lascio tutto a 0, per af ..io avevo quella a 3 assi percui punto singolo centrale . Esposizione quasi sempre media ponderata ..o spot... |
| sent on January 24, 2019 (9:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for the advice Cinzia. You're right, recover the shadows in the M10 creates a lot of noise and I never dared push me up 2 stop: I'll try if you recover well in camera raw. With the M5 and the M1 you see the difference? I only have the standard lenses: Would you recommend the Olympus M. Zuiko Digital and 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO? Is it worth the expense? Grazie per i consigli Cinzia. Hai ragione, recuperare le ombre nella m10 crea molto rumore e non ho mai osato spingermi in alto di 2 stop: proverò se si recupera bene in camera raw. Con la m5 e la m1 si vede la differenza? Ho solo gli obbiettivi standard: mi consiglieresti il Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO? Vale la spesa? |
| sent on January 26, 2019 (9:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
One of the best lenses I have tried, you I recommend the shopping, now is at a good price for what da, I cìe I have since it came out practically :-D, the M1 is certainly more performanc than the M10, newer and better holds the ISO , but I suggest you invest in optics, which last much more than the machines, then later on you decide whether to change the M10 with M1 or M5.
plus the 12-40 to 40mm makes nice close up :-D una delle migliori lenti che ho provato, si ti consiglio la spesa, adesso si trova ad un buon prezzo per quello che da, io cìe l'ho da quando e' uscito praticamente , la m1 e' sicuramente piu' performante della m10, piu' nuova e tiene meglio gli iso, ma ti consiglio di investire in ottiche, che durano molto di piu' delle macchine, poi piu' avanti deciderai se cambiare la m10 con m1 o m5.
oltretutto il 12-40 a 40mm fa dei bei close up |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
