What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 04, 2011 (12:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I am not convinced the composition, subject too left with plenty of space in front.
The subject does not see it clear, why did you use ISO 200 and f/11? The shutter speed is not help you!
Hello
Fabio Non mi convince la composizione, soggetto troppo a sx con molto spazio davanti.
Il soggetto non lo vedo nitido, come mai hai utilizzato 200 iso e f/11? Il tempo di scatto non ti ha certo aiutato!
Ciao
Fabio |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (13:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I tried to have all the subject in focus.
Unfortunately, the complex D300S and 600/5.6 MF is difficele to obtain: (
Certainly over 400ISO I would get the same sharpness even with a time of 1/1000 ... Ho provato ad avere il soggetto tutto a fuoco.
Purtroppo il complesso D300S e 600/5.6 MF è difficele da ottenere :(
Di sicuro oltre i 400ISO avrei ottenuto la stessa nitidezza anche col tempo di 1/1000 ... |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (15:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Augustine sorry but do not be too sure about your previous statement. Raise the ISO allowed you to freeze the shake that is objectively present the indian .. 1/60 sec. I'm really borderline.
As personal interpretation would have given more air under and worked with light-shadow only on the perch. hello and good light, laurel scusami Agostino ma non essere troppo sicuro sulla tua affermazione precedente. Alzare gli iso ti permetteva di congelare il micromosso che è oggettivamente presente del martino .. 1/60 sec. sono davvero border-line .
Come interpretazione personale avrei dato più aria sotto e lavorato con luci-ombre solo sul posatoio. ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (15:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, I have eliminated the roost because it was almost all burned: (
Anyway thanks to both, try the next session with iso320, slowly I can find the right balance XD Grazie, il posatoio l'ho eliminato perchè era quasi tutto bruciato :(
Cmq grazie ad entrambi, la prossima sessione proverò con iso320, pian piano riuscirò a trovare il giusto equilibrio XD |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With a Nikon D300S? 400ISO to go quiet as default and then decide case by case whether to get off or get up and uses the deviation exposure :-). hello and good light, laurel Con una nikon d300s ? vai tranquillo come default a 400iso e poi decidi caso per caso se scendere o alzare e sfrutta la deviazione di esposizione  . ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (18:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
At ISO400 already known of loud noise: (
Consider that my 600 is the version of AIS that its does not have the sharpness of noble motorized, and more to have a minimum of manageability, use it at f / 8. A ISO400 noto già del forte rumore :(
Considera che il mio 600 è la versione AIS che di suo non ha la nitidezza dei blasonati motorizzati, ed in più per avere un minimo di gestibilità, va usato a f/8. |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (19:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It should not be easy to use with a view manual!
With the D300S you should have no problems with noise at 400ISO ;-)
Hello
Fabio Non deve essere facile usare un'ottica manuale!
Con la d300s non dovresti avere problemi di rumore a 400iso 
Ciao
Fabio |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (20:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes and No. .. depends on the correct exposure.
If you notice, the blue plumage, can already be seen at ISO200, caused by the need to maintain a good relationship bird / perch (the latter almost completely burnt: ( Si e No... dipende dalla giusta esposizione.
Se noti, sul piumaggio celeste, già si vede a ISO200, dovuta dalla necessità di mantenere un buon rapporto uccello/posatoio (quest'ultimo quasi completamente bruciato :( |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry Augustine, you may post the same photos done at 200 to 400 and 800 iso and performing the same steps as in pp? I do not want your sense of digital noise was too subjective. hello, laurel scusami Agostino, potresti postare una stessa foto eseguita a 200 a 400 e 800 iso ed eseguendo gli stessi passaggi in p.p. ? Non vorrei che la tua sensazione di rumore digitale fosse troppo soggettiva . ciao, lauro |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
De nada, the next time I take pictures in sequence :)
Anyway, yes, always speak of a subjective vision.
Monday to resume work as soon as I can do this test ^ _ ^ De nada, la prossima volta faccio le foto in sequenza :)
Cmq si, parlo sempre di una visione soggettiva.
Lunedì riprendo a lavorare, appena posso faccio questa prova ^_^ |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (22:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much ;-), laurel Grazie Mille , lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
