What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 03, 2019 (17:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A case in which an alternative light would help to highlight the subject by attenuating the shadows. Un caso in cui una luce alternativa avrebbe aiutato ad evidenziare maggiormente il soggetto attenuando le ombre. |
| sent on January 03, 2019 (20:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks pigi Grazie pigi |
| sent on January 07, 2019 (22:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Correct composition but I agree on the light. Michele Composizione corretta ma concordo sulla luce. Michele |
| sent on January 07, 2019 (23:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Michele Grazie Michele |
| sent on July 05, 2019 (20:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition, I like background and perch, I agree with those who preceded me with regard to light and it seems to me that the butterfly is slightly out of parallelism since in the top of the wings the sharpness is decreasing compared to the rest of the body. I would have used slower times like 1/200 to close d the diaphragm and earn pdc and lower the iso, 1/8000 are more suitable for animals in very fast movement. Buona la composizione, mi piacciono sfondo e posatoio, concordo con chi mi ha preceduto per quanto riguarda la luce e mi sembra che la farfalla sia leggermente fuori parallelismo dato che nella parte alta delle ali la nitidezza va diminuendo rispetto al resto del corpo. Avrei cmq usato tempi più lenti tipo 1/200 per chiudere d il diaframma e guadagnare pdc e abbassare gli iso, 1/8000 sono più indicati per animali in rapidissimo movimento. |
| sent on July 05, 2019 (21:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Michelangelo grazie of the passage and tips and tips that are always useful greetings Ernesto GrAzie Michelangelo del passaggio e dei consigli e dritte che sono sempre utili saluti Ernesto |
| sent on June 14, 2021 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
After a long time I return to the shot, where I think there is to review the balance of white. Pading of shooting data, you don't need to use such high sensitivity to have an equally fast shooting time. The butterfly is not in flight, so the important thing is to get a time that gives you confidence to avoid micromosso. Since you snapped at 105, if you wanted to go quiet you could have used 1/200 A distanza di tempo rientro sullo scatto, dove credo ci sia da rivedere il bilanciamento del bianco. Parlando dei dati di scatto, non serve utilizzare sensibilità così elevata per avere un altrettanto veloce tempo di scatto. La farfalla non è in volo, quindi l'importante è ottenere un tempo che ti dia la sicurezza per evitare il micromosso. Visto che hai scattato a 105, volendo andare tranquilli avresti potuto utilizzare 1/200 |
| sent on June 15, 2021 (7:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello pigi and for a long time I didn't feel it already had told me in previous posts but pultroppo I no longer have the lens to try cmq thanks Ciao pigi e da parecchio che non la sentivo già me lo aveva già detto in post precedenti ma pultroppo non ho più la lente per provare cmq grazie |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |