What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 12, 2018 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bingo.... :-o... did you see it work!!!!! And the more you do it the better Bingo.... ...hai visto che funziona!!!!! E più ne fai meglio vengono |
| sent on December 12, 2018 (23:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have seen Ringhjos, I will continue to experiment so as to have always better results :-D Ho visto ringhjos, continuerò a sperimentare così da avere risultati sempre migliori  |
| sent on December 13, 2018 (1:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Eye on hot pixels, that is, those illuminated dots... is the sensor that heats up, then activates the noise reduction on the long exposures (I have Nikon, with the Canon I do not know where it is in the menu)... puts us twice to give birth to the photo, but at least you do not have those pesky pixels Burned!! Occhio agli hot pixel, cioè quei puntini illuminati...è il sensore che si riscalda, quindi attiva il noise reduction sulle lunghe esposizioni (io ho nikon, con le Canon non so dove sia nel menù)...ci mette il doppio a partorire la foto, ma almeno non hai quei fastidiosi pixel bruciati!! |
| sent on December 13, 2018 (5:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I noticed him a little while ago, but I think the noise reduction is active, if it were active but should do it anyway what would it mean? Si gli ho notati poco fa accidenti, ma io credo che il noise reduction sia attivo, nel caso fosse attivo ma dovesse farlo comunque che cosa vorrebbe dire? |
| sent on December 13, 2018 (7:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Can it depend on whether I shoot in raw? So maybe it didn't reduce the camera software? Può dipendere dal fatto che ho scattato in raw? Quindi magari non ha effettuato la riduzione il software della fotocamera? |
| sent on December 13, 2018 (13:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you shoot in raw. As it should be, the NR is activated Cmq... you realize that the photo is displayed in preview on Live view after a long time from the shot, as I told you before the long processing time is given by the fact that the NR activated , produces a second photo but all Black that goes to compensate for the hot pixels that are created given the long exposure. With full frame cameras this phenomenon is reduced by a lot given the goodness of the sensor! Se scatti in raw.come giustamente deve essere, il NR si attiva cmq...te ne accorgi dal fatto che la foto viene visualizzata in anteprima sul live view dopo molto tempo dallo scatto, come ti dicevo prima il tempo lungo di elaborazione è dato dal fatto che il NR attivato, produce una seconda foto ma tutta nera che va a compensare gli hot pixel che si creano data l''esposizione lunga. Con fotocamere full frame questo fenomeno è ridotto di tantissimo data la bontà del sensore! |
| sent on December 13, 2018 (13:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then I do not know what's going on, because on my noise reduction is enabled, how come I do not perform the operation fi removing the burnt pixels?
:-( Allora non so cosa stia succedendo, perché sulla mia è attivato il noise reduction, come mai non mi effettua l'operazione fi rimozione dei pixel bruciati?
 |
| sent on December 13, 2018 (14:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It does not remove the burnt pixels, because if they were burnt it would be a damage... only it overheats the sensor and some pixels rise in temperature creating those tiny illuminated dots!! It would take the opinion of an expert, which I am not. Non rimuove i pixel bruciati, perché se fossero bruciati sarebbe un danno...solo che si surriscalda il sensore e alcuni pixel salgono di temperatura creando quei piccolissimi puntini illuminati!! Occorrerebbe l'opinione di un esperto, cosa che io non sono. |
| sent on December 13, 2018 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The problem is that these do not seem to me only enlightening but they are just white and therefore burned... How could I ask the opinion of some expert? I tried on the forum but alas no one responds :-( Il problema è che questi non mi sembrano solo illuminanti ma sono proprio bianchi e pertanto bruciati... Come potrei fare a chiedere l'opinione di qualche esperto? Ho provato sul forum ma ahimè nessuno risponde |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
