What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 07, 2018 (14:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Other than Trioplan, did you use the extension tube? Altro che trioplan, hai usato il tubo prolunga? |
| sent on December 07, 2018 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, 13 mm, the shortest I have of those canon mount.
I also have an old one from 7mm but unfortunately does not have the joke for the pin, so you have to shoot TA. As length would be better, more manageable freehand. 13 mm begin to be "remote"
actually this picture is made with the Fujinon 55mm 1.6 a 1.6 But there is not in the lens list. So I put the closest I :-D
is noted by the fact that the bubbles at the edge frame are concentric and oval, while the 2.2 does not have this effect. si, 13 mm, il piu corto che ho di quelli attacco canon (dove posso attaccare il mio adattatore con pin-push)
ne ho anche uno vecchio da 7mm ma purtroppo non ha la battuta per il pin, quindi devi per forza scattare a TA. come lunghezza sarebbe migliore, piu gestibile a mano libera. 13 mm cominciano ad essere "terremotabili"
in realtà questa foto è fatta con il fujinon 55mm 1,6 a 1.6 ma non c'è nell'elenco lenti. quindi ho messo la piu simile che ho 
si nota dal fatto che le bolle al bordo frame sono concentriche e ovali, mentre il 2,2 non ha questo effetto. |
| sent on December 07, 2018 (15:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Is there a 1.6?
Esiste un 1.6?
|
| sent on December 07, 2018 (15:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, in two attacks, Fujica X's most common and most rare and expensive M42.
guess which I needed? :-D
is a very special lens, either the AMI or the ODI.
A TA is not at all sharp, is to hit the fire is U inside to the lot, because it has a very short focus ring, so just rounds of half mm you're out of focus, put the reduced PDC to 1.6 and the damage is done.
A friend of mine had it and LHA resold it just for the difficulty of focusing.
But if you learn to get in tune is a spectacular lens! Si, in due attacchi, fujica x più comune e m42 più raro e costoso.
Indovina quale mi serviva?
È una lente molto particolare, o la ami o la odi.
A ta non è per niente nitida, è azzeccare il fuoco è u nterno al lotto, perchè ha una ghiera di messa a fuoco molto corta, quindi appena giri di mezzo mm sei fuori fuoco, mettici la ridotta pdc a 1. 6 e il danno è fatto.
Un mio amico l aveva e lha rivenduto proprio per le difficoltà di messa a fuoco.
Ma se impari ad entrarci in sintonia è una lente spettacolare! |
| sent on December 07, 2018 (15:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This is without pipes, so you see the particular Bokeh that has
Https://www.juzaphoto.com/m_galleria.php?t=2827785&l=it Questa è senza tubi, così vedi il Bokeh particolare che ha
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=2827785&l=it |
| sent on December 07, 2018 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad Non male |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
