RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » lioness Brescia

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



nudo

View gallery (7 photos)

lioness Brescia sent on November 27, 2012 (1:00) by Stefanoinsider. 15 comments, 1521 views. [retina]

at 74mm, 13 sec f/29.0, ISO 100, tripod.

proiezioni



View High Resolution 17.1 MP  



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user8022
avatar
sent on November 27, 2012 (2:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Feature

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (10:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How beautiful! Effect is noteworthy that gave me ...! Now not like I knew it was a projection wow! because the girl seems to be really under that arch! :-)
I really like the idea! Bravo! :-)
For the photo itself, personally, I would prefer more clarity and peace I do not much the base of the tower, which to me is a little 'too white.
Greetings :-)

avatarjunior
sent on November 27, 2012 (11:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Pietraccia, for clarity we have to work, estimated that the projection is in the dark and with one click along the base of the tower, alas, are the spotlights at night.
I'll keep this advice












avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (12:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Imagine :-)
Ah ok then clear :-) :-)
Greetings

avatarjunior
sent on November 27, 2012 (17:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the other two beautiful shots you posted, this I have to be honest I do not like.
really understand what it means too little
.. because the girl seems to be really under that arch! ..
?.

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (18:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, Hmm .. Oh maybe it's me that I see wrong :-) :-)
But I think that the vision is a picture of a tower, taken from the inside of an arch. I see the bow just above the girl's head. And my initial impression was that she was really under the arch! :-) And that it was not a projection that portion.
So a significant effect of perspective. :-)
But it could well be that by dint of watching photos rincojonito me know hehe
Greetings.

avatarjunior
sent on November 27, 2012 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'm sorry, I did not see well (from iphone ..) you're right, hello

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (21:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

:-D:-D:-D But daiiiii and make comments of a photo looking from iPhone?! But daiiiii iiii!
Mess ... Greetings

avatarjunior
sent on November 27, 2012 (23:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello guys, just to take away any doubt, here's how I made it all up:
first shot view of the tower of the castle of Brescia from under the arch of the drawbridge.
second shot taken at home projecting the first shot the woman's body and on the wall of the house.
Good light to all

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (23:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It 's interesting, but if I put the projector very close to the camera would have avoided much of the shadows.

avatarjunior
sent on November 28, 2012 (0:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In that sense, because more than moving the projector by the camera from my experiments is the model that generates shadows based on distance from the parrete where the first image is projected

avatarsenior
sent on November 28, 2012 (0:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Tremendous applause! :-D

avatarjunior
sent on November 28, 2012 (10:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my humble opinion is a beautiful picture and the idea is not bad. Compliments

avatarsenior
sent on November 29, 2012 (19:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If the projector and the camera are very close to the model should largely cover their own shadows, or am I wrong?

avatarjunior
sent on November 29, 2012 (23:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A MR71, I think theoretically, the projection cone would be captured entirely on the model's body, I would like against a smaller portion of the projected image ..
one day I experience it all.
Thanks


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me