What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 27, 2018 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Interesting, almost iconic, if it wasn't a seagull... :-D
Bella, maybe there was even a tighter cut...
Hello, Davide Interessante, quasi iconica, se non fosse un gabbiano... 
Bella, forse ci stava anche un taglio più stretto...
Ciao, Davide |
| sent on November 27, 2018 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you David, in fact it is not cut, I made a couple of versions cut. But to cut means to eliminate the reflection on the river or, with a horizontal cut to eliminate the river altogether, soon I will post the one without a river :-) Ti ringrazio Davide, in effetti non è tagliata, ho fatto un paio di versioni tagliate. Però tagliare vuol dire eliminare il riflesso sul fiume oppure, con un taglio orizzontale eliminare il fiume del tutto, prossimamente posterò quella senza fiume  |
| sent on November 28, 2018 (7:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Pierluigi, I understand your motives...
The cut I was referring to was vertical, around the middle third to be clear, in order to tighten more on the contrast between the bird and the shape of the Mole, renounding the reflection, which in my opinion does not add to the story.
Obvious, very personal opinion :-)
Good day,
David Ciao Pierluigi, capisco le tue motivazioni...
Il taglio cui mi riferivo era verticale, attorno al terzo centrale per intenderci, al fine di stringere maggiormente sulla contrapposizione fra l'uccello e la sagoma della Mole, rinunciando al riflesso, che a mio parere non aggiunge alla storia.
Ovvio, parere personalissimo
Buona giornata,
Davide |
| sent on November 28, 2018 (8:44) | This comment has been translated
 |
user67391 | sent on February 07, 2020 (9:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful, with the big river and the Mole blurred and in the foreground, the seagull in focus to give depth to the image. I wouldn't eliminate the Po at all, the composition for me is fine with that. Molto bella, con il grande fiume e la Mole sfocati e in primo piano, il gabbiano a fuoco a dare profondità all'immagine. Io non eliminerei per niente il Po, la composizione per me va bene cosi. |
| sent on February 07, 2020 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Andrea, I am happy that you like it Grazie Andrea, contento Ti piaccia |
| sent on December 29, 2020 (19:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Pierluigi, a wonderful photo :-o
Tanti congratulations and a dear greeting Ciao Pierluigi, una foto stupenda
Tanti complimenti ed un caro saluto |
| sent on December 29, 2020 (20:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Fabio reciprocate the greeting, good light :-) Grazie Fabio contraccambio il saluto, buona luce |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
