What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 25, 2012 (20:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Overall not bad, too bad that sliver of light on the back and slight blurring of the body and rear paws, probably due to the fact that the pipes without contacts hann closed the diaphragm adeguatamente.Comunque your effort deserves praise encouragement. Complessivamente non è male,peccato quella lama di luce sulla schiena e la leggera sfocatura del corpo e delle zampine posteriori,dovuta probabilmente al fatto che i tubi senza contatti non hann chiuso il diaframma adeguatamente.Comunque il tuo sforzo merita un plauso di incoraggiamento. |
| sent on December 26, 2012 (8:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Certainly that with the use of the pipes the free hand is not ideal given the increase of rr and consequently the decrease of the pdc. If you want the photo had to play on a smaller aperture increases the sensitivity as much as possible. Of course, as long as the maf is cured. Certamente che con l'uso dei tubi il mano libera non è l'ideale visto l'aumento del rr e conseguentemente la diminuzione della pdc. Volendo la foto era da giocare su un diaframma più chiuso aumentando la sensibilità il più possibile. Naturalmente sempre che la maf sia curata. |
| sent on December 26, 2012 (9:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the maf seems fairly accurate on the eye but the position of the subject "shot" to the rear creates a large area in the foreground out of focus, also personally find the background too white and the shadow is not suitable for a macro ... hello la maf sembra abbastanza precisa sull'occhio ma la posizione del soggetto "girato" verso la parte posteriore crea una grossa zona in primo piano fuori fuoco, inoltre personalmente trovo lo sfondo troppo bianco e l'ombra proiettata non adatta ad una macro...ciao |
user1338 | sent on December 26, 2012 (9:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Bokeh, the focus falls on the eye but the composition did not values, stays on top of the body and that great reflection disturbing.
Of course, the overall brightness not helped you it nor the free hand.
This in my opinion ........
Hello. Sono daccordo con Bokeh, il fuoco cade sull'occhio ma la composizione non lo valorizza, rimane in primo piano il corpo e quel grande riflesso che disturba.
Certo, la luminosità generale non ti ha aiutato ne tantomeno il mano libera.
Questo a mio parere........
Ciao. |
| sent on December 26, 2012 (16:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to all and especially with the passage of the criticism and advice.
If I'm learning something is thanks to you!
Are not ironic, covering my old photos, I thought that the first decent, I notice all the flaws.
Thank you! Grazie a tutti del passaggio e sopratutto grazie delle critiche e dei consigli.
Se sto imparando qualcosa è grazie a voi!
Non sono ironico, riguardando le mie foto vecchie, che prima credevo decenti, mi accorgo di tutti i difetti.
Grazie! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
