What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 21, 2012 (22:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful, congratulations!
How do you work this Sigma 150/500? Molto bella,complimenti!
Come lavora questo Sigma 150/500? |
| sent on November 21, 2012 (23:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Maverick! It is definitely better than the 100-400 but it worthily (4 years now) his duty, even if by now are aware of the limitations and would like to move on to something more powerful Grazie Maverick! Non è sicuramente meglio del 100-400 ma fa degnamente (da 4 anni ormai) il suo dovere, anche se ormai sono consapevole dei limiti e vorrei passare a qualcosa di più performante |
| sent on November 22, 2012 (0:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Reflections, light / dark, detail, color and three-dimensionality to the top!
alternatives? Sigma 120-300mm os, canon 100-400mm or canon 1d mark III:-D
hello and good light, laurel Riflessi, chiari/scuri, dettaglio, colori e tridimensionalità al top !
alternative? sigma 120-300mm os , canon 100-400mm o canon 1d mark III 
ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on November 22, 2012 (0:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ellemme thanks to you for the ride. Thank you for the advice but unfortunately has plagued me a bad monkey for white paintings worth more than € 5,000:-D:-D I was thinking the new 200-400 (depending on price), or the coupling 100-400 + 500 F4 L IS (old version, and then to take used). All this because I get to have, as I said in another topic, 800-1000 mm in case of emergency :) Grazie anche a te Ellemme per il passaggio. Ti ringrazio anche per i consigli ma purtroppo mi ha afflitto una brutta scimmia per i tele bianchi del valore superiore a 5000€ Stavo pensando al nuovo 200-400 (dipende dal prezzo), oppure all'accoppiata 100-400 + 500 F4 L IS (vecchia versione, quindi da prendere usato). Il tutto perchè vorrei arrivare ad avere, come ho gia detto in un altro topic, 800-1000 mm in casi di emergenza :) |
| sent on November 22, 2012 (9:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To obtain this type of shooting I see hard because you try as much as possible not to crop, that is clear sogegtto with a particular detail, and sometimes you are forced to do it by hand ... better then a superzoom ... and that the whole thing does not weigh too much.
Have you ever tried to focus with a 500mm free hand for more than 3 minutes?
From the best quality I see a canon 5d mark 1d mark III or IV, as part of the wider zoom range to 200-400mm in the rankings, I would see a better 120-300mm becomes the practical side of a 240-600mm. Keep in mind that the 100-400mm to 400mm is sharper in the 150-500mm and 500mm although Croppi to simulate 500mm, the Canon is slightly sharper than the 500mm sigma .... mounted on one of the 2 above and reflex with the canon 1.4x extender does not lose the central af.
hello, lauro o.t. Per questo tipo di riprese la vedo dura perchè si cerca il più possibile di non croppare, che il sogegtto sia nitido con un particolare dettaglio e a volte si è costretti a farlo a mano libera ... meglio quindi un superzoom... e che il tutto non pesi eccessivamente.
Hai mai provato a puntare con un 500mm a mano libera per più di 3 minuti?
Dal lato qualitativo vedo meglio una canon 5d mark III o 1d mark IV , come escursione zoom a parte l'ampio 200-400mm nella classifica, vedrei meglio un 120-300mm che diventa al lato pratico un 240-600mm. Tieni presente che il 100-400mm a 400mm è più nitido del 150-500mm e che a 500mm anche se croppi fino a simulare i 500mm, il canon è leggermente più nitido del 500mm sigma....montato su una delle 2 reflex sopraindicate e con extender 1.4x il canon non perde l'af centrale.
ciao, lauro |
| sent on November 22, 2012 (10:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks again for the passage Ellemme! Your speech can not be faulted in any case it is not for this type of shooting (very basic) I'd buy the 500. We must also keep in mind that between a plane and the other does not necessarily have to stay with the 500 in hand, but I can rest. I had considered the 120-300, but take it to always use duplicate (or nearly so) I do not think it would make sense.
“ Keep in mind that the 100-400mm to 400mm is sharper than the 150-500mm and 500mm although Croppi simulate up to 500mm, the Canon is slightly sharper than the 500mm sigma „
I agree on this, but 4 years ago I had the money to take the canon and I focused on the sigma. Now I would like to take one (or more) lenses final and the 100-400 it would be only if coupled to 500F4 L IS.
“ 2 SLR mounted on one of the above and with the canon 1.4x extender does not lose the central af. „
I know that, but first I would not have a great quality and even the second hoped range (800-1000 mm in case of emergency)
In any case, thank you for the advice. There is still time and we definitely think about it. Meanwhile, expect the bait 200-400 especially considering the cost effective :)
Grazie ancora per il passaggio Ellemme! Il tuo discorso non fa una piega, in ogni caso non è per questo tipo di riprese (molto semplici) che comprerei il 500. Bisogna anche tenere in conto che tra un aereo e l'altro non devo stare per forza con il 500 in mano, ma lo posso poggiare. Avevo preso in considerazione il 120-300, ma prenderlo per utilizzarlo sempre duplicato (o quasi) secondo me non avrebbe senso.
" Tieni presente che il 100-400mm a 400mm è più nitido del 150-500mm e che a 500mm anche se croppi fino a simulare i 500mm, il canon è leggermente più nitido del 500mm sigma"
D'accordo anche su questo, ma 4 anni fa non avevo i soldi per prendere il canon e mi sono orientato sul sigma. Adesso vorrei prendere una(o più) lenti definitive e il 100-400 lo sarebbe solo se accoppiato al 500 F4 L IS.
" montato su una delle 2 reflex sopraindicate e con extender 1.4x il canon non perde l'af centrale. "
Questo lo so ma prima cosa non avrei una grandissima qualità e seconda neanche il range sperato (800-1000 mm in casi di emergenza)
In ogni caso ti ringrazio per i consigli. C'è ancora tempo e sicuramente ci penserò su. Intanto aspetto che esca il 200-400 soprattutto per considerare il costo effettivo :)
|
| sent on November 22, 2012 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful composition with excellent color and excellent sharpness, congratulations.
Sincerely, Michael. Bellissima composizione con colori eccellenti ed un'ottima nitidezza, complimenti.
Cordiali saluti,Michele. |
| sent on November 23, 2012 (14:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to you Michael! Grazie anche a te Michele! |
| sent on April 19, 2013 (9:29)
Beautiful pic , well done  |
| sent on April 22, 2013 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Devil! Thanks Devil! |
| sent on April 22, 2013 (22:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful picture, yet the company's real :)
In particular, the sharpness and the background colors are very beautiful, you have chosen a very favorable position. Always Schiphol?
Recently I am concentrating nell'avifauna (when I have time), but I have to decide to give me a ride with you from airports, surely it would be instructive!
hello
Una bellissima foto, ancora della compagnia reale :)
In particolare la nitidezza ed i colori dello sfondo sono molto belli, hai scelto una posizione molto favorevole. Sempre Schiphol?
Recentemente mi sto concentrando nell'avifauna (quando ho tempo), ma devo decidermi a farmi un giro con te per aereoporti, sicuramente sarebbe istruttivo!
ciao
|
| sent on April 22, 2013 (23:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Peter for your comment. It always Schiphol! :)
“ but I have to decide to give me a ride with you from airports, surely it would be instructive!
„
oh my God ... I am in awe :) Grazie Peter per il tuo comment. Si sempre Schiphol! :)
" ma devo decidermi a farmi un giro con te per aereoporti, sicuramente sarebbe istruttivo!
"
oddio...mi sento in soggezione :) |
| sent on April 23, 2013 (8:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful background and sharp subject. Beautiful photo compliments. Bellissimo sfondo e soggetto nitido. Bella foto complimenti. |
| sent on April 24, 2013 (23:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to you too Fotoddo! Grazie anche a te Fotoddo! |
| sent on April 24, 2013 (23:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, super colors! Bella, colori super! |
| sent on April 25, 2013 (10:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Superb!
Stupenda!
|
| sent on May 01, 2013 (10:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to you and Juza Angeloc! Grazie anche a voi Juza e Angeloc! |
| sent on June 06, 2013 (12:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, a great sense of three-dimensionality!
Congratulations! Molto bella, da un grande senso di tridimensionalità!
Complimenti! |
| sent on June 06, 2013 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Bzanna! Grazie Bzanna! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
