What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 20, 2012 (9:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow! new avatar, new signature and a lot of beautiful pictures! wow! nuovo avatar, nuova firma ed un sacco di belle foto! |
| sent on November 20, 2012 (9:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks stefano signing I'm still thinking about which one is the final :-) grazie stefano la firma ci sto ancora pensando a quale sia quella definitiva  |
| sent on November 20, 2012 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
My compliments a really nice shooting signing like a lot to me and also I can not find the definitive
renewal compliments
hello frank
i miei complimenti veramente una bella ripresa la firma piace un sacco anche a me e anche io non riesco a trovare quella definitiva
rinnovo i complimenti
ciao franco
|
| sent on November 20, 2012 (18:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful photos!
I did not understand why you chose that time:
- 30 'by heaven, I think, is the limit for not having star moves to 14mm on APSC.
- 15 min for the church do not understand them, seem to me a lot, especially the iso minimal.
I do not know pentax, have you noticed that it is better to go with the times rather than raise a bit 'iso?
I ask because I, with a Nikon D90, I noticed that it is better to raise a bit 'iso (while remaining low, type 400) instead of using a very long time.
ps: as nit I would try to use torches or shots flash to illuminate the church, so as not to notice the shadow on the facade (I imagine) the lights of a neighboring country.
Bella foto!
Non ho capito bene perchè hai scelto quei tempi:
- i 30' per il cielo, se non sbaglio, sono il limite per non avere stelle mosse a 14mm su apsc.
- i 15 min per la chiesa non li capisco, mi sembrano tanti soprattutto agli iso minimi.
Non conosco pentax, hai notato che è meglio salire con i tempi invece che alzare un po' gli iso?
Ti chiedo perchè io, con una nikon D90, ho notato che è meglio alzare un po' gli iso (pur rimanendo bassi, tipo 400) invece di usare tempi molto lunghi.
ps: come pelo nell'uovo avrei provato a usare delle torce o colpi di flash per illuminare la chiesa, in modo da non far notare l'ombra sulla facciata da (immagino) le luci di un paese vicino.
|
user18104 | sent on November 20, 2012 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
From Sardinia always beautiful photos of night! but incidentally with a fellow like Zuben could not be different! Dalla Sardegna sempre foto meravigliose di notturni!!! ma daltronde con un conterraneo come Zuben non potrebbe essere diverso! |
| sent on November 20, 2012 (19:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for the ride, the low iso with a long time I can get less noise and more detail in my profile there is also the only version of 30 seconds and note the difference then light the lights were a country, unfortunately I do not have even an external flash:-D Vi ringrazio del passaggio, gli iso bassi con un tempo lungo riesco ad avere meno rumore e più dettaglio nel mio profilo c'è anche la versione solo di 30 secondi e noti la differenza poi la luce si erano le luci di un paese purtroppo non ho ancora un flash esterno  |
| sent on November 20, 2012 (21:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Orion Entertainment on the ruins! Spettacolo Orione sul rudere!!! |
| sent on November 20, 2012 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-) Stephen Stefano |
| sent on November 21, 2012 (11:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really nice, with details to sell. Davvero bella, con dettagli da vendere. |
| sent on November 21, 2012 (12:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank you for this version came well combining the two shots published a few days ago:-D Ti ringrazio questa versione è venuta bene unendo i due scatti pubblicati qualche giorno fà |
| sent on November 22, 2012 (18:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And would you believe that the more you look, the more you like it! It 's really very nice! Congratulations, hello, Charles E ti credo che più la guardi e più ti piace!! E' veramente molto bella!! Complimenti ,ciao, Carlo |
user684 | sent on November 22, 2012 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
really very beautiful and charming ... in my opinion lacks just a little 'quality of Samyang I remember being a very good lens.
still compliments veramente molto bella e suggestiva...a mio avviso manca solo un po' di qualita del samyang che ricordo essere un ottima lente.
ancora complimenti |
| sent on November 22, 2012 (21:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
congratulations, great shot! complimenti, foto meravigliosa !! |
| sent on November 22, 2012 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
happy your comments carlo frank and A.rizzi:-D felice dei vostri commenti carlo franco e A.rizzi |
| sent on November 23, 2012 (17:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful.
I agree with the title of the photo.
hello Molto bella.
concordo con il titolo della foto.
ciao |
user16587 | sent on November 23, 2012 (17:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice shot! maybe the sky is a bit noisy! has been treated? bello scatto! forse il cielo è un po rumoroso! è stato trattato? |
| sent on November 23, 2012 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks andrea, thanks fed86er is the union was made by jpeg, every other day I take two shots in raw and do the best fusion let's see the final result:-D grazie andrea, grazie fed86er si l'unione è stata fatta dal jpeg, a giorni dovrei riprendere i due scatti in raw e fare la fusione meglio vediamo un pò il risultato finale |
| sent on November 23, 2012 (20:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful photos. Bella foto. |
| sent on November 23, 2012 (21:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks:-D Grazie |
| sent on November 25, 2012 (19:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A wonder! Why? not try with less exposure to the sky to make it less stars, but more nitiede, would have a more natural look, do not you think?
Una meraviglia! Perch? non provi con meno esposizione del cielo per rendere meno stelle , ma più nitiede , avrebbe un aspetto più naturale, non credi?
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
