What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 02, 2011 (14:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Striking appearance thanks to a little 'dark. The prospect is harmonious, I like it. Suggestiva grazie anche all'aspetto un po' dark. La prospettiva è armoniosa, mi piace. |
| sent on September 02, 2011 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, thank you for your feedback.
the 12-24 at 12mm restiuito yield great! ciao, grazie del tuo riscontro.
il 12-24 a 12mm ha restiuito una resa grandiosa! |
| sent on September 02, 2011 (17:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree! It seems to me that the Sigma gifts ... :-D Concordo! Mi sembra però che Sigma non lo regali...  |
| sent on September 04, 2011 (14:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful ... great yield! bellissimo...ottima la resa! |
| sent on November 02, 2011 (15:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, but I think you've exaggerated to "open" in PP, we see a very strong grain in the sky and the shadow of similpanchina structure in the lower left that in the 5D MKII at ISO 160, despite the 5 seconds of exposure, I seem a little too pronounced.
IMHO of course, and in any case congratulations, nice shot! Bellissima, credo però che tu abbia esagerato ad "aprirla" in P.P., si vede una grana molto forte nel cielo e nell'ombra della struttura similpanchina in basso a sx che nella 5D MKII a ISO 160, nonostante i 5 secondi di esposizione, mi sembrano un pò troppo marcati.
Ovviamente IMHO e comunque complimenti, bello scatto! |
| sent on November 14, 2011 (3:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I "open" with the hdr. and this predisposition is not optimal to recover the shadows of 5d2 produced grain. but that I've held for the benefit of an amazing recovery of light and color in the various windows ;) l'ho "aperta" con l'hdr. questo e la predisposizione non ottimale a recuperare le ombre della 5d2 hanno prodotto grana. ma che mi son tenuto a vantaggio di un recupero incredibile di luci e colori nelle varie finestre ;) |
| sent on November 29, 2011 (9:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful photos, I must say. Excellent work in PP.
Have you also tried a case for b / w?
In my opinion would be the best.
Lorenzo Bellissima foto, non c'è che dire. Ottimo il lavoro in pp.
Hai per caso provato anche un b/n ?
Secondo me sarebbe il massimo.
Lorenzo |
| sent on November 05, 2012 (13:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
as the 5dmII coupled with the sigma wide angle?
com'è l'accoppiata 5dmII con il sigma grandangolare?
|
| sent on November 05, 2012 (23:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Lorenzo
I had not seen your comment ... I see the recupere bw and then you place a try ;-)
@ Cult
I gave away that sigma is 5d2. 5D3 to go to in the first case, in the second case the x 1635II xkè I needed the 2.8 .... it was not that I had money I would certainly recover two held sigma xkè ... not only was a good copy, but xi 12mm .. its unique quality and low distortion. sometimes I miss them.
right now I would love probare the 15 zeiss 2.8 ...'s got a friend and 5D3 is a show .... @lorenzo
non avevo visto il tuo commento...vedo di recupere il bw e poi ti posto una prova ;-)
@cult
ho dato via sia 5d2 che sigma. per passare a 5d3 nel primo caso, nel secondo caso x il 1635II xkè mi serviva il 2.8....non fosse stato che dovevo recuperare due soldi avrei senz'altro tenuto il sigma...non solo xkè era una buona copia ma x i suoi 12mm..unici, di qualità e poca distorsione. a volte mi mancano.
ora come ora mi piacerebbe tanto probare il 15 zeiss 2.8...ce l'ha un amico e su 5d3 è uno spettacolo.... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
