What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 16, 2018 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad, even if you notice the typical retinature of Registax, I would try with Autostakkert. Niente male, anche se si nota la tipica retinatura di Registax, proverei con Autostakkert. |
user59947 | sent on September 16, 2018 (13:33) | This comment has been translated
 |
| sent on September 16, 2018 (15:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Giancarlo. In fact of Registax only use the wavelet to increase a little ' the detail, the stack I do it with Autostackert (I forgot to put it in the caption...). I also noticed a slight screening on the final image: Do you think it is the fault of the passage in Registax? Grazie Giancarlo. In realtà di Registax uso solo i wavelet per aumentare un po' il dettaglio, lo stack lo faccio proprio con Autostackert (ho dimenticato di metterlo in didascalia...). Ho notato anch'io una leggera retinatura sull'immagine finale: tu credi che sia colpa del passaggio in Registax ? |
| sent on September 16, 2018 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To me registax often this problem, just acting on the wavelets a me Registax da spesso questo problema, proprio agendo sui wavelets |
| sent on September 19, 2018 (12:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I only found this problem when I enabled the drizzle!!!
Squeeze as much as possible the new instrumentation!!! ;-) nice iimagine! 8-) Io questo problema l'ho riscontrato solo quando ho abilitato il drizzle!!!
Spremila il più possibile la nuova strumentazione!!!  bell'iimagine!  |
| sent on September 19, 2018 (15:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks, Leo. Do you think I can use a Barlow 3x (should I buy it), or is it too 6000 focal length? Grazie Leo. Pensi che riesco ad utilizzarla una barlow 3x (dovrei comprarla), o è troppo 6000 di focale ? |
| sent on September 19, 2018 (17:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have that photographic of lolli (3x).
still failed to have acceptable results Io ho quella fotografica di Lolli (3x).
Ancora non sono riuscito ad avere risulatati accettabili |
| sent on September 19, 2018 (21:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Giancarlo, how's the 3x of Lolli? It costs less than Celestron and I would be tempted.... Giancarlo, come va la 3x di Lolli ? Costa meno della Celestron e sarei tentato.... |
| sent on September 19, 2018 (22:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So, it looks very good, they advised me because it is dedicated to photography.
I have it for a few months, but, as you know, the free time-subject combinations desired-weather are a true terno to the lot.
I got to try it on my C8HD, on the moon.
Unfortunately it was a test hit and run, with a bad sky, but I can tell you that it is to have good results, in my opinion, you need a good sensitive room, in my case we are practically at F/30....
Surely I will try to try it next week, on the moon, weather permitting, since here by me for example, for tomorrow, there is the risk of a Mediterranean cyclone... Allora, sembra fatta molto bene, me l'hanno consigliata in quanto dedicata proprio alla fotografia.
Ce l'ho da un po' di mesi, ma, come ben saprai, le combinazioni tempo libero-soggetto desiderato-meteo sono un vero terno al lotto.
Ho avuto modo di provarla sul mio C8HD, sulla luna.
Purtroppo è stata una prova mordi e fuggi, con un cielo pessimo, ma ti posso dire che è per avere buoni risultati, secondo me, è necessaria una buona camera sensibile, nel mio caso siamo praticamente a f/30....
Sicuramente cercherò di provarla la prossima settimana, sulla luna, meteo permettendo, visto che qua da me ad esempio, per domani, c'è il rischio di un ciclone mediterraneo...
Altra cosa importante: quella di Lolli è modulare, può diventare anche una 2X |
| sent on September 20, 2018 (9:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I saw her. And the Super Plan-APO 2/3x: If it is as good as you say the price is honest, and I can also recover a few segments by selling my Meade APO 2x.... Thanks for the tip. ;-)
However I did not understand if you can vary the relationship in an ongoing or has only two fixed positions... L'ho vista. E la super plan-apo 2/3x: se è buona come dici il prezzo è onestissimo, e posso anche recuperare qualche spiccio vendendo la mia Meade apo 2x.... Grazie per la dritta.
Però non ho capito se puoi variare il rapporto in modo continuativo o ha solo due posizioni fisse... |
| sent on September 20, 2018 (10:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Two fixed positions.
You get the 2x by unscrewing an extension cord. Due posizioni fisse.
Ottieni il 2x svitando una prolunga. |
| sent on September 24, 2018 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've been fighting with the Barlow for several months... for the focal point I can tell you that I have seen people discreetly use a 5x :-o on a 25cm!
Other thing, I know that the meades work well exclusively with their Barlow... I do not know Celestron... Io con le barlow ci sto litigando da diversi mesi...per la focale ti posso dire che ho visto persone utilizzare discretamente un 5x su un 25cm!
Altra cosa, so che i Meade lavorano bene esclusivamente con le loro barlow...non so celestron... |
| sent on October 02, 2018 (19:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful recovery, I agree with the advice of Giancarlo for the Software, as to the Barlow I can advise you without qualms the Zeiss Baader 2-4x (serve the extension tubes accessories to vary the magnification), is formidable, only drawback the price, strange eh? However the last Celestron is very good, I used it a lot, but unfortunately you can not ' pull ' without losing quality :-( Bella ripresa, concordo con i consigli di Giancarlo per i Software, in quanto alla Barlow ti posso consigliare senza remore la Baader Zeiss 2-4x (servono i tubi di prolunga accessori per variare l'ingrandimento), è formidabile, unico neo il prezzo, strano eh? Comunque la Celestron Ultima è molto buona, l'ho usata molto, ma purtroppo non la puoi 'tirare' senza perdere in qualità  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
