JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on September 15, 2018 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good colors in the foreground and detail. compositional level was preferable to leave more space where the look of the subject was addressed and eliminate the open in the background superbright. Even if the subject was confined, it was preferable to use a more appropriate optics like the classic 70-300mm. Imho You remember that if the subject was taken up in a controlled environment or during a falconry show, as by regulation, you have to indicate in the shutter data. (Correct phrase: "Subject taken in Amb. Checked) More exactly in the" caption "field that exists to add more annotations or any information you want to share about the photo ;-) Hello, Lauro Buoni i colori in primo piano e il dettaglio. A livello compositivo era preferibile lasciare più spazio dove lo sguardo del soggetto era rivolto ed eliminare la parte sullo sfondo superluminosa. Anche se il soggetto era confinato, era preferibile utilizzare un'ottica più consona tipo il classico 70-300mm . (imho)
Ti ricordo che se il soggetto è stato ripreso in ambiente controllato o durante uno spettacolo di falconeria, come da regolamento, si deve indicare nei dati di scatto. (frase corretta: " soggetto ripreso in amb.controllato ) più esattamente nel campo "Didascalia" che esiste per aggiungere altre annotazioni o qualsiasi informazione tu voglia condividere riguardo la foto
sent on September 15, 2018 (22:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi, thanks a lot for the advice. I added in the captions as you indicated. Regarding the photo, I'll try to do another version with what you recommended. I'm an amateur and I accept everything that I will be told. The 70-300 will be the next purchase. Thanks again Ciao, grazie mille per i consigli. Ho aggiunto nelle didascalie quanto mi hai indicato.
Per quanto riguarda la foto, proverò a fare un'altra versione con quanto mi hai consigliato.
Sono un dilettante e accetto tutto quello che mi sarà detto.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
9.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
