What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 12, 2018 (18:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know how it was the original background, but definitely made so has its because :-) The specimen is beautiful. Greetings! Non so com'era lo sfondo originale, ma sicuramente fatta così ha il suo perchè  L'esemplare è bellissimo. Un saluto! |
| sent on September 12, 2018 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The original background was exactly like this...... white Karst rocks
A greeting to you ;-) Lo sfondo originale era esattamente così...... rocce carsiche bianche
Un saluto a Te  |
| sent on September 12, 2018 (21:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then congratulations and just ;-) Allora complimenti e basta |
| sent on September 13, 2018 (15:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very pushed development, as a whole a good effect even if I would have cared even better the details. The species is very beautiful and the blur does the photography.
Hello
Fabio Sviluppo molto spinto, nell'insieme un buon effetto anche se avrei curato ancor meglio i dettagli. La specie è molto bella e lo sfuocato fa la fotografia.
Ciao
Fabio |
| sent on September 13, 2018 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all!
Fabio What do you mean by development pushed? Grazie a Tutti !
Fabio cosa intendi per sviluppo spinto ? |
| sent on September 13, 2018 (16:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would have done a more natural post production but they are tastes;) Avrei fatto una post produzione più naturale ma sono gusti ;) |
| sent on September 13, 2018 (17:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'd like to know what you mean by more natural, I honestly don't understand Mi piacerebbe sapere cosa intendi per più naturale, sinceramente non capisco |
| sent on September 13, 2018 (17:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Let me explain: if you shoot in raw I do not think that the image recorded by the machine is the same as that published by you on Juza. The sharpness yield on the head and a little too hard and takes away naturalness, I would have used a radius of sharpness less to have a more real image... or given less contrast mask (depends on how you do the post production). It is strange also the net detachment between the head to Fuochissimo and the rest of the body of the snake that goes clearly outside. The background I read that is so original but appears a little too burnt... maybe because of the light too harsh.
Anyway are not critical, I'm gusti...io just prefer to keep the shot the most faithful to the reality... and this shot gives the impression of being a little too lavorato...ma maybe I'm wrong, it's just my impression :-)
a greeting
Fabio Mi spiego: se hai scattato in raw non penso che l'immagine registrata dalla macchina sia uguale a quella pubblicata da te su juza. La resa della nitidezza sulla testa e un poco troppo dura e toglie naturalezza, avrei usato un raggio di nitidezza minore per avere un immagine più reale...oppure dato meno maschera di contrasto (dipende da come fai la post produzione). E' strano anche lo stacco netto tra la testa a fuochissimo e il resto del corpo del serpente che va nettamente fuorifuoco. Lo sfondo leggo che è cosi originale ma appare un pò troppo bruciato...forse a causa della luce troppo dura.
Comunque non sono critiche, sono gusti...io semplicemente preferisco mantenere lo scatto il più fedele alla realtà...e questo scatto dà l'impressione di essere un pò troppo lavorato...ma magari mi sbaglio, è solo la mia impressione :-)
Un saluto
Fabio |
| sent on September 13, 2018 (17:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok Fabio, Thanks, now I understand what you mean. As far as the contrast mask is, it could be a little softer though, compared to the raw, the difference is not appreciable. The fire plane of the head is different from the body of the snake and having snapped with diaphragm at 5.6 is wanted to isolate the particular. The white is white, I do not believe burned and, in any case, absolutely tried with over-exposure of over 2 stops.
Then, as you rightly said, matter of taste :-) Ok Fabio, grazie, ora ho capito cosa intendi. Per quanto riguarda la maschera di contrasto ci sta, poteva essere un po' più morbida anche se, rispetto al raw, la differenza non è apprezzabile. Il piano di fuoco della testa è diverso dal corpo del serpente ed aver scattato con diaframma a 5,6 è voluto per isolare il particolare. Il bianco è bianco, non credo bruciato e, in ogni caso, assolutamente cercato con sovraesposizione di oltre 2 stop.
Poi, come hai giustamente detto Tu, questione di gusti :-) |
| sent on September 13, 2018 (18:00) | This comment has been translated
|
| sent on September 14, 2018 (15:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find it an original and well-realized shot. Congratulations. Io lo trovo uno scatto originale e ben realizzato. Complimenti. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
