What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 09, 2018 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, the signal harvest is great, but I think you exaggerated a bit with the saturation also I see the stars a bit ' red. Ciao, il segnale raccolto è ottimo, secondo me però hai esagerato un po' con la saturazione inoltre vedo le stelle un po' rosse. |
| sent on September 09, 2018 (20:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe a little red load.. But spectacular photo :-o Forse un pochino carico il rosso .. ma foto spettacolare  |
| sent on September 10, 2018 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
On the orange color (more than red) of the stars I noticed it too, and I think it is a bit ' due to the nebular filter used a bit ' to a possible chromatic residue of the optics (it is always a 400 2.8!). For the red too load, you can always attenuate or tweak a little, on my monitor it seemed ok so, but it is also a matter of personal taste of course...
Thanks in any case of the advice, I admit that with a reflex is never easy to keep everything under control.... Sul colore arancio (più che rosso) delle stelle l'ho notato anche io, e credo sia imputabile un po' al filtro nebulare usato un po' ad un possibile residuo cromatico dell'ottica (è sempre un 400 2,8!). Per il rosso troppo carico, si può sempre attenuare o modificare un po', sul mio monitor mi sembrava ok così, ma è anche questione di gusti personali ovviamente...
Grazie in ogni caso dei consigli, ammetto che con una reflex non è mai facile tenere tutto sotto controllo.... |
| sent on September 10, 2018 (10:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me it is a great photo, also considered the subject "not easy" :-) the red is not easy to handle as color.. Per me è una gran foto, considerato anche il soggetto "non facile" il rosso non è facile da gestire come colore.. |
| sent on September 10, 2018 (18:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good Christian.
I am glad that you may have enjoyed the spectacular sky of my land.
would be interesting to also know the integration data Ottima Christian.
Mi fa piacere che tu possa aver goduto del cielo spettacolare della mia terra.
Sarebbe interessante anche conoscere i dati di integrazione |
| sent on September 10, 2018 (22:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
They are only 8-minute poses at 1600 ISO ef f2,8. With D1 filter to enhance a hair the nebulosita. Sono solo 8 pose da 8 minuti a 1600 iso ef f2,8. Con filtro d1 per esaltare un pelo le nebulosita. |
| sent on September 10, 2018 (23:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well I would say great! I guess you've also enjoyed a little observation with the naked eye...
Beh direi ottimo! Immagino ti sia goduto anche un po' di osservazione ad occhio nudo...
|
| sent on September 11, 2018 (0:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately I had with me only the 400 2.8, which is poorly suited to a visual use, and a refractor from 102... But already with the naked eye the show was remarkable! Purtroppo avevo con me solo il 400 2,8, che mal si presta ad un uso visuale, ed un rifrattore da 102... però già ad occhio nudo lo spettacolo è stato notevole! |
| sent on September 11, 2018 (8:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The 400 behaves really well!
I tried the 135 f/2, but as the focus was perfect the stars came too big.
I hope everything depended on the humidity. Il 400 si comporta davvero bene!
Io ho provato il 135 f/2, ma per quanto la messa a fuoco fosse perfetta le stelle son venute troppo grandi.
Spero dipendesse tutto dall'umidità. |
| sent on September 11, 2018 (10:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Canon F2 135 or Samyang? I have the Canon and to make it perfect I prefer to close it to 2.8.
In This photo However, the D1 filter helped me to attenuate the stars a little. Il 135 F2 Canon o Samyang? Io ho il Canon e per renderlo perfetto preferisco chiuderlo a 2,8.
In questa foto comunque il filtro D1 mi ha aiutato ad attenuare un po' le stelle. |
| sent on September 11, 2018 (11:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Canon. Using it on the ASI unfortunately I have no control over the diaphragms. I also have a 100L macro f/2.8. I should try it to see if the problem is the maximum aperture regardless.
The 300l, at its maximum aperture (F/4), was pretty much perfect. Il Canon. Usandolo sulla ASI purtroppo non ho controllo sui diaframmi. Ho anche un 100L macro f/2.8. Dovrei provarlo per capire se il problema è la massima apertura a prescindere.
Il 300L, alla sua massima apertura (f/4), era praticamente perfetto. |
| sent on September 11, 2018 (11:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Giancarlo made to mill a cap to put on the lens.. Reduce the diameter of the 135 and also the aperture... you could try
to limit throw away a few euros Giancarlo fatti fresare un tappo da mettere sulla lente.. riduci il diametro del 135 e anche l'apertura... potresti provare
al limite butti via pochi euro |
| sent on September 11, 2018 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A step-down ring 72-49 will be enough to get more or less the 2.8 diaphragm. From China you take it to a shipped euro! It is screw like a filter and does not create strange vignetting since it is a fixed tele. Different would be for more wide optics or zooms. Basterebbe anche un anello step-down 72-49 per ottenere più o meno il diaframma 2,8. Dalla cina lo prendi a un euro spedito! Si avvita come un filtro e non crea vignettature strane visto che è un tele fisso. Diverso sarebbe per ottiche più wide o zoom. |
| sent on September 11, 2018 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great.
Thanks for the info.
today, to take away the doubt, I will also try the 100 F/2.8. Ottimo.
Grazie per le informazioni.
Oggi, per togliermi il dubbio, proverò anche il 100 f/2.8. |
| sent on September 12, 2018 (11:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
At this moment the ring that you need to find it on the bay with the number 162751365404, to the figure of 1.39 euros!!! In questo momento l'anello che ti servirebbe lo trovi sulla baia col numero 162751365404, alla cifra di 1,39 euro!!! |
| sent on September 12, 2018 (11:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Cristian. Friendly! Grazie Cristian. Gentilissimo! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
