What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user28347 | sent on September 03, 2018 (19:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For macros it is better to close the diaphragm to F8, F11, F13 and less short time, try per le macro è meglio chiudere il diaframma a f8,f11,f13 e tempo meno corto,prova |
| sent on September 03, 2018 (19:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No, it's not a macro... It's a wanted effect although I should certainly try different times. The optics in use, the Cyclop 85mm F 1.5 has no iris is a f 1.5 just. The lens focuses at best only at the center while around produces scary twirling bokeh. In This picture, however the subject did not have behind the point light needed.. A blurry polychrome background and nothing else came out. Obviously at f 1.5 The manual focus is extremely difficult... No, non è una macro … è un effetto voluto anche se dovrei certamente provare tempi diversi. L'ottica in uso, il Cyclop 85mm f 1.5 non ha iride è un f 1.5 e basta. La lente mette a fuoco al meglio solo al centro mentre intorno produce bokeh twirling spaventosi. In questa foto, però il soggetto non aveva alle spalle la luce puntiforme necessaria .. è uscito uno sfondo sfocato policromo e niente altro. Ovviamente a f 1.5 la messa a fuoco manuale è oltremodo difficoltosa ... |
user28347 | sent on September 03, 2018 (19:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
OK, a droplet I see in focus ok,una gocciolina la vedo a fuoco |
| sent on September 03, 2018 (19:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, in theory the focus part had to be the stem column in the center of the photo and the focus peaking of my Sony seemed to guarantee it.. But not.
But the experiment with this sequence of photos is to create a background brush with a particular highlight in the center without having ambitions of hyper-realism.. Obviously the results are what they are, you have to work on it, but the effect that can come out with blurred Pasty almost from painting. Kinic lines and twirling I like.. Sì, in teoria la parte a fuoco doveva essere la colonna staminale al centro della foto e il focus peaking della mia sony sembrava garantirmelo.. e invece no.
Però l'esperimento con questa sequenza di foto è quello di creare uno sfondo pennellato con un particolare in evidenza al centro senza avere mire di iperrealismo.. ovviamente i risultati sono quello che sono, bisogna lavorarci, ma l'effetto che può uscire con sfocati pastosi quasi da pittura. linee cinematiche e twirling a me piace .. |
user28347 | sent on September 03, 2018 (20:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
OK, I understand, not easy, like Sigma Art ok ,ho capito,mica facile,tipo sigma art |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
