What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 07, 2018 (12:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pity only the blur, at 1/10 Cmq is easy, difficult to do better. Hello peccato solo il micromosso, ad 1/10 cmq e' capibile, difficile fare meglio. ciao |
| sent on November 17, 2018 (12:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot, nice paper, good!!!!!!!!! A greeting Bruno bello scatto, bel documento, brava!!!!!!!!! un saluto Bruno |
| sent on November 28, 2018 (8:59) | This comment has been translated
Thank you all! |
| sent on October 24, 2019 (11:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice, but I would have cut the photo more and used a slightly faster time, the panning also came at 1/50... Raikkonen is always a good driver! Bella, ma avrei tagliato maggiormente la foto e usato un tempo leggermente più veloce, il panning veniva anche ad 1/50... Raikkonen é sempre un bel pilota! |
| sent on May 12, 2020 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm honest, a shot I wouldn't have kept... trashed in the car... Unfortunately the micromox is evident I understand the difficulty in this situation, but I would have looked for something different. Good evening Fabio Sono sincero, uno scatto che non avrei tenuto...cestinato in macchina...purtroppo il micromosso è evidente Capisco la difficoltà in questa situazione, ma avrei cercato qualcosa di diverso. Buonasera Fabio |
| sent on November 21, 2020 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
... I tell you good. It is right to dare and if a photo communicates something the technical imperfections are fully acceptable. We can go home from the racetrack with 1000 perfect sharp photos taken at 1/1000 or with 2 photos that "talk" taken at 1/10 - 1/20. I always choose the second way. only thing I would have cut off the bottom part because it distracts a little bit. I don't know Sony, but that f/32 diaphragm probably took your sharpness away as well. ...io invece ti dico brava. E' giusto osare e se una foto comunica qualcosa le imperfezioni tecniche sono pienamente accettabili. Possiamo tornare a casa dall'autodromo con 1000 foto nitide perfette scattate a 1/1000 o con 2 foto che "parlano" scattate a 1/10 - 1/20. Io scelgo sempre la seconda via. Unica cosa avrei tagliato via la parte in basso perchè distrae un poco. Non conosco Sony ma probabilmente anche quel diaframma a f/32 ti ha tolto nitidezza. |
| sent on June 14, 2022 (14:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Buccaner, pleasant and original photos, different from the usual panning, front and 3/4 boring but that alas here they like very much. I would only optimize with a slightly more pushed cutout and a slightly more aggressive post production. Concordo con Buccaner, foto piacevoli e originali, diverse dai soliti panning, frontali e 3/4 noiosissimi ma che ahimè qui piacciono molto. Ottimizzerei soltanto con un ritaglio po' più spinto e una post produzione un po' più aggressiva. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |