Try 18mm | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

16.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Varie View gallery (9 photos)

Try 18mm sent on November 15, 2012 (17:47) by Ale.r. 2 comments, 875 views.

at 18mm, f/2.8, ISO 200, hand held.

Jpeg uscito direttamente dalla macchina, nessuna pp, parametri on camera tutti a 0 simulazione pellicola provia

View High Resolution 16.0 MP

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Jacky_x88

sent on June 29, 2014 (3:51)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ciao, ho un dubbio. In questa galleria ci sono 2 foto di questo bastoncino, una con diaframma 4 e questa che de diaframma 2.8, ma forse è il contrario o sbaglio? Perchè nella foto f4 lo sfondo è maggiormente sfocato rispetto a 2.8? Grazie, spero mi rispondi perchè sono interessato a questa macchina Sorriso

Hello, I have a doubt. In this gallery we have 2 photos of this stick, with a diaphragm 4 and that this de aperture 2.8, but maybe it's the other way around is not it? Why in the photo f4 background is more blurred than 2.8? Thank you, I hope you answer me because I'm interested in this machine :-)

Ale.r

sent on July 02, 2014 (14:03)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ciao scusa leggo solo ora, l'altra ha un maggiore sfocato perché è fatta a 55mm quindi non più grandangolo, dunque con un maggiore stacco dei piani, a tutta apertura (f4) mentre questa è fatta a 18mm sempre a tutta apertura (f2.8).
Se questo 18-55 mantenesse f2.8 anche a 55mm avrebbe uno sfocato ancora maggiore.

Hello sorry I read just now, the other has a greater blurred because it is made from 55mm wide angle so no more, so with a greater detachment of floors, wide open (f4), while this is always done at 18mm wide open (f2. 8).
If this 18-55 f2.8 maintained even at 55mm would have a blurred even more.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.