What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 250000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 01, 2011 (16:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The idea I consider great, the depth of field instead of a little poor.
Rather than close to f / 8 f/16 try and use the tripod, you'll see that you will recover the crispness of the grain to the left and right edges that are now not perfectly sharp than the center leaf.
When the idea is there ... you're halfway there.
HELLO L'idea la reputo ottima, la profondità di campo invece un pochino scarsa.
Anzichè chiudere a f/8 prova con f/16 e usa il cavalletto, vedrai che recupererai la nitidezza anche delle venature al bordo destro e sinistro che sono adesso non perfettamente nitide rispetto il centro foglia.
Quando l'idea c'è...si è già a metà dell'opera.
CIAO |
| sent on September 01, 2011 (17:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the advice! I had already thought to close the aperture more, but the idea of ??fuzzy after all is not so bad .. by concentrating more eyes on central detail! cmq I will try as you said! ciaoo Grazie per il consiglio! avevo già pensato a chiudere di piu il diaframma, ma l'idea dello sfocato tutto sommato non è male..da modo di concentrare di piu lo sguardo sul dettaglio centrale! cmq proverò anche come tu hai detto! ciaoo |
| sent on September 23, 2011 (19:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with maxspin, on the other hand if you already 'with f8 you had to use 1/15 using a f16'd have a rough time at risk, or raise the ISO but with definite risk rumore.In for this kind of photo is the basic tripod, something that I, unfortunately, I do not hardly ever, hello concordo con maxspin,d'altronde se gia' con f8 hai dovuto usare 1/15 usando un f16 avresti avuto un tempo a rischio mosso,oppure alzare gli ISO però con rischio rumore.In definitiva per questo genere di foto è basilare il treppiede,cosa che anche io ,purtroppo non faccio quasi mai,ciao |
| sent on October 11, 2011 (9:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The problem is that I can not lift a lot of the iso with my 450D: (you notice is the noise from the 400 iso .. Il problema è che non posso alzare molto gli iso con la mia 450D :( si vede subito il rumore a partire dai 400 iso.. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
