What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 17, 2018 (7:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shot where I do not completely convinces the choice of portions in focus. On a dragonfly I would try to have all the wings in focus or the eyes. I think it's good to look for a shot set but perhaps for this purpose I would have closed the diaphragm more to make the background more readable. Scatto in cui non mi convince del tutto la scelta delle porzioni a fuoco. Su una libellula cercherei di avere tutte le ali a fuoco oppure gli occhi. Ritengo buona l'idea di cercare uno scatto ambientato ma forse a questo scopo avrei chiuso maggiormente il diaframma per rendere più leggibile anche lo sfondo. |
| sent on August 17, 2018 (9:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Closing the diaphragm the background becomes too intrusive and therefore, in my opinion, creates confusion and consequently would diminish the subject.
Thanks anyway of your comment: it is always pleasant and constructive to have an opinion from others. Chiudendo il diaframma lo sfondo diventa troppo invadente e quindi, secondo me, crea confusione e di conseguenza sminuirebbe il soggetto.
Grazie comunque del tuo commento: è sempre piacevole e costruttivo avere un parere da altri. |
| sent on August 17, 2018 (17:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Personally I think it is better to get a background a little ' more present than a very sharp subject, in addition in this case seen the lens used the presence of the background would be even more justified since the lens was also built to get valid close up Set. Personalmente penso sia meglio ottenere uno sfondo un po' più presente che un soggetto poco nitido, in più in questo caso visto la lente utilizzata la presenza dello sfondo sarebbe ancor più giustificata visto che la lente è stata costruita anche per ottenere validi close up ambientati. |
| sent on August 17, 2018 (18:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Pigi47 of the step and comment.
I also have pictures as you and Nicola advise me to post, but to choose an impact image I opted for this.
Next time I will propose a classic shot without "dare"..... thanks anyway ;-) Grazie Pigi47 del passaggio e commento.
Ho anche immagini come tu e Nicola mi consigliate di postare,ma per scegliere un'immagine d'impatto ho optato per questa.
Prossima volta proporrò uno scatto classico senza "osare".....grazie comunque |
| sent on August 19, 2018 (8:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful composition, and pleasant to see, I would have only held a higher aperture value (F11/13) to get a wider PDC and have to focus even the wings, raising some of the ISO and perhaps daring shutter speeds a bit shorter considering also the goodness of the lens in ques Tione.
Composizione bella, e gradevole da vedere, avrei solo tenuto un valore diaframmi piu alto (f11/13) per ottenere un PDC piu ampio e avere a fuoco anche le ali, alzando un po gli iso e azzardando magari tempi di scatto un po piu corti considerando anche la bonta della lente in questione.
|
| sent on August 19, 2018 (11:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the advice James, but as I got to answer earlier, I did not want to get too much background in the main subject to not create excessive confusion in the latter. I have images also perfectly perpendicular to the sensor plane, but I had hit this, with all the qualitative limitations you have underlined.
Thanks anyway of your passage and consideration. ;-) Grazie del consiglio Giacomo,ma come ho avuto modo di rispondere precedentemente,non volevo entrasse troppo lo sfondo nel soggetto principale per non creare eccessiva confusione in quest'ultimo.Ho immagini anche perfettamente perpendicolari al piano sensore ,ma mi aveva colpito questa ,con tutte le limitazioni qualitative che hai sottolineato.
Grazie comunque del tuo passaggio e considerazione. |
| sent on May 10, 2020 (6:05)
??? |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
30.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
