JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on August 09, 2018 (6:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There's also that kind of triple trumpet over the lower left flare you've reported that's worrying C'è anche quella specie di tripla trombetta sopra al flare più basso di sinistra che hai segnalato tu che è preoccupante
sent on August 09, 2018 (9:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had this problem too, look at this picture made with an EF 200 F/2.0 and 5d2 baaderized... [URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php? l = IT&T = 1915877 I made of all the colors including the arguing with Baader who asked me once to pull over the filter to the sensor and another to distance it... then checked the lot of Production and concluded saying that he was sorry but not having installed them they could only raise their hands...!!! :-| :-/ I replaced the Baader filter with an Astrodon and.... magically the problem is gone. Surely the optics plays an important role, but if the filter has reflexes...... I hope I was helpful, hello Avevo anch'io questo problema, guarda questa foto fatta con un EF 200 f/2.0 e 5d2 Baaderizzata ...
Ne ho fatte di tutti i colori compreso il litigare con Baader che mi chiedeva una volta di accostare il filtro al sensore e un'altra di distanziarlo ...poi ha controllato il lotto di produzione ed ha concluso dicendo che si dispiaceva ma non avendolo installato loro non potevano che alzare le mani ... !!!
Ho sostituito il filtro Baader con un Astrodon e ....magicamente il problema è sparito. Sicuramente l'ottica gioca un ruolo importante, ma se il filtro ha riflessi ......
sent on September 07, 2018 (14:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But... the picture isn't ripped, right? Because they are very strange as reflected in that position, especially those on the left. Ma... l'immagine non è croppata, giusto? Perché sono molto strani come riflessi in quella posizione, specialmente quelli sulla sinistra.
sent on September 10, 2018 (14:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The image is not croppata. I found that the "fan" reflections around the stars are due to the modification of the reflex, therefore not due to the Sigma 14-24. Probably the Baader filter that replaces the original one reflects in a particular way the light that strikes it and creates these artifacts. I do not know if the same phenomenon also generate long reflexes in the lower left, I will investigate.... L'immagine non è croppata. Ho scoperto che i riflessi a "ventaglio" attorno alle stelle sono dovuti alla modifica della reflex, quindi non dovuti al Sigma 14-24. Probabilmente il filtro Baader che sostituisce quello originale riflette in maniera particolare la luce che lo colpisce e crea questi artefatti. Non so se per lo stesso fenomeno si generino anche i riflessi lunghi in basso a sinistra, indagherò....
sent on October 26, 2018 (0:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I am very interested in this lens as an alternative to Canon 16-35 F4 is. From what I see it seems to confirm the reviews that say it is very resolvent even at the edges and has little coma. You confirm it thanks Sono molto interessato a quest'ottica in alternativa al canon 16-35 f4 is. Da quel che vedo mi sembra confermare le recensioni che dicono che è molto risolvente anche ai bordi e ha poco coma. Me lo confermate grazie
sent on October 26, 2018 (12:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Confirmed.... but eye that compared to 16-35 is another kind of optics.... apart from the significantly higher weight does not have a focal range like that of the 16-35 which is almost a very slender wide-angle handyman. Confermatissimo.... ma occhio che rispetto al 16-35 è un altro genere di ottica.... a parte il peso decisamente più elevato non ha una gamma focale come quella del 16-35 che è quasi un tuttofare grandangolare molto snello.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
