What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 08, 2018 (16:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Allan, honestly it is difficult to give an opinion on this photo, the only thing that does not convince me much is the lighting, which leaves very clear shadows under the vase for the rest I would not know what to say:) Ciao Allan, onestamente è difficile dare un parere su questa foto, l'unica cosa che non mi convince molto è l'illuminazione, che lascia delle ombre molto nette sotto il vaso per il resto non saprei che dire :) |
| sent on August 08, 2018 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Lorenz93 thanks for the ride. This is a kind unknown to me, photos to works of art, where I think that photography must only bring the spectator in front of the work and let make his own considerations. The lighting is very bad and very little, but it was an exposition, where position and lighting were decided by those who cared for the exhibition. I posted in the hope that someone expert of this kind of photos to the art could give me some "straight" to not make the picture seem meaningless... @Lorenz93 grazie per il passaggio. Questo è un genere a me sconosciuto, foto ad opere d'arte, dove penso che la fotografia deve solo portare lo spettatore davanti all'opera e lasciare fare le proprie considerazioni. l'illuminazione é pessima e molto poca, ma era un'esposizione, dove posizione e illuminazione erano decise da chi curava la mostra. L'ho postata nella speranza che qualcuno esperto di questo genere di foto all'arte mi sapesse dare qualche "dritta" per non fare sembrare la foto senza senso... |
user72446 | sent on August 08, 2018 (23:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I appreciate the work but not its light. That probably being a museum was artificial d not editable...... Apprezzo l'opera ma non la sua luce. Che probabilmente essendo un museo era artificiale d non modificabile...... |
| sent on August 09, 2018 (8:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well... clear that in a museum you can not do what you want, but for me the photo does not work. IE or was more contextualized Https://i2.wp.com/fotografiaartistica.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/thomas-struth-pergamon-museum-3-1.jpg?resize=600%2C450&ssl=1 Here For example is investigating the relationship between public and art Https://www.leofficine.photo/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/06.jpg In this is played with irony. But if you want to represent the work as still life the quality level must be very different, maybe trying to request some permission to take a valid photo mah... chiaro che in un museo non si può fare quello che si vuole, ma per me la foto non funziona. Cioè o era maggiormente contestualizzata i2.wp.com/fotografiaartistica.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/thomas-str qui per esempio si indaga il rapporto tra pubblico e arte www.leofficine.photo/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/06.jpg in questa si gioca con ironia. Ma se vuoi rappresentare l'opera come still life il livello qualitativo deve essere ben diverso, magari provando a richiedere qualche permesso per poter fare una foto valida |
| sent on August 10, 2018 (10:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride. I will try to put into practice the advice! Grazie del passaggio. Proverò a mettere in pratica i consigli! |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |