What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 06, 2018 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice portrait, trying to figure out the composition of the light (as suggested by you), I imagine you used at least an F 5.6 (maybe even f8?), a stripbox on the right (you see in the eyes) and a light filling behind the left (Stripbox there too? But maybe something more "tight", like a snoot)
Luke Bel ritratto, cercando di capire la composizione della luce (come da te suggerito) , immagino hai usato almeno un f5.6 (forse anche f8?), una stripbox sulla destra (si vede negli occhi) e una luce di riempimento dietro a sinistra (stripbox anche lì? Ma forse qualcosa di più “stretto” , tipo uno snoot)
Luca |
| sent on September 07, 2018 (5:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Strip box 8x24 (inches I don't know in cm) angled camera at 45°c place very close to subject. Second strip box equal to the first left room as a fill light perpendicular to the ground and kick light left camera to open the shadows on the jaw. The background is a Thunder gray from Savage Universal (not imported into Italy). If I remember correctly it is a f10.
Remember the closer the light to the subject becomes softer but up to a point of no return. Having cheekbone and prominent jaw the diagram of lights was made to serve these features, giving in the room and then in post production a look that recalls the billboards of Netflix that are seen here in Los Angeles. Strip box 8x24 (inches non so in cm) camera dx angolato a 45gradi posto molto vicino al soggetto. Seconda strip box uguale alla prima camera sx come fill light perpendicolare al terreno e kick light camera sx per aprire le ombre sulla mascella. Lo sfondo è un Thunder gray della Savage Universal (non viene importato li in italia). Se non ricordo male è un f10.
Scattato in tethering con Capture one e fatta li la prima lieve correzione colore dell'incarnato (le Canon sparano troppo sul rosso di default). Poi in photoshop con un blemish removal, poi un dodge and burning, un lieve luminosity in frequency separation, color toning e sharpening.
Ricorda più avvicini la luce al soggetto più diventa morbida ma fino ad un punto di non ritorno. Avendo zigomi e mascella prominente lo schema di luci è stato fatto per servire questi tratti somatici, dando in camera e poi in post produzione un look che richiama i cartelloni di Netflix che si vedono qui a Los Angeles. |
| sent on September 10, 2018 (16:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much for the explanation! Do you experience capture one better than Photoshop or is it complementary? Currently, but I'm an amateur, I find it very well with Photoshop....
for embodied Canon I agree, tending to red, in fact with profiles set (for raw), I always go to "desaturate" the red and make the skin more truthful.
on the Netflix look, I agree that you have reproduced just that style! You see and you recognize!
Congratulations on your shots... and the study of lights grazie mille della spiegazione! per tua esperienza capture one meglio di photoshop o è complementare? attualmente, ma sono un amatore, mi trovo molto bene con photoshop....
per incarnato canon concordo, tendente al rosso, infatti coi profili settati (per raw), vado sempre a "desaturare" il rosso e rendere la pelle più veritiera.
sul look netflix, concordo che hai riprodotto proprio quello stile! si vede e si riconosce!
complimenti per i tuoi scatti... e lo studio delle luci |
| sent on September 10, 2018 (18:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Capture One is complementary, does not replace Photoshop, but is the best raw converter on the market. For shooting in tethering does not exist on the other alternative market (Lightroom is too slow and cumbersome).
In Photoshop is 90% of my post production. Use a wacom intuos Pro small to bring your technique to another level. Capture One è complementare, non sostituisce Photoshop, ma è il miglior raw converter sul mercato. Per lo scatto in tethering non esiste sul mercato altra alternativa (lightroom è troppo lento e farraginoso).
In Photoshop avviene il 90% della mia post produzione. Utilizza una wacom Intuos Pro small per portare ad un altro livello la tua tecnica. |
| sent on September 12, 2018 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The wacom I have for a few months and in fact it helps a lot to be precise!
Capture one for now I see as not shooting in tethering I have to evaluate well!
Thanks for the advice! La wacom l'ho da un po' di mesi e in effetti aiuta molto ad essere precisi!
Capture one per ora vedo in quanto non scattando in tethering devo valutare bene!
Grazie per i consigli! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
