What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 25, 2018 (17:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good idea bravo, ottima idea |
| sent on July 25, 2018 (21:13) | This comment has been translated
Very unusual! |
| sent on July 25, 2018 (23:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, in my opinion has managed to half, in the sense that this I would have seen without the mirrors, especially the eye in the mirror in the lower right seems to me too sharp compared to the ethereal atmosphere of the double figure, is a personal opinion but it seemed right to write it .
will probably answer me tomorrow but by me it's 4 o'clock in the afternoon.
A greeting
Umberto Ciao, secondo me è riuscita a metà, nel senso che questa l'avrei vista senza gli specchi, soprattutto l'occhio nello specchio in basso a destra mi sembra troppo nitido rispetto all'atmosfera eterea della doppia figura, è un parere personale ma mi sembrava giusto scriverlo.
Probabilmente mi risponderai domani ma da me sono le 4 del pomeriggio.
Un saluto
Umberto |
| sent on July 25, 2018 (23:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello
I agree with Umbri, the photo that you put today I like more than the others, has something that is besides the usual.
Also I think that the mirrors are something superfluous, you had already said everything and sometimes the details do not serve.
Ciao
Concordo con Umbri, la foto che hai messo oggi mi piace di piu delle altre, ha qualcosa che e' oltre al solito.
Anche io penso che gli specchi sono qualcosa di superfluo, avevi gia' detto tutto e a volte i dettagli non servono.
|
| sent on July 26, 2018 (0:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to all of the passage and comments, always welcome.
Yes, the photo held up even without the mirrors, maybe it was better.
My intention was to make a surreal photo, the position of the model is the one I asked. In the original idea I had, in the mirrors there had to be other body parts, a bit like in the first photo with the mirrors that I put long ago. But the effect was only erotic and I wanted more. I wanted to give the idea of a woman imprisoned in the gallery, a ghost wandering the tracks and the details in the mirror must add concern.
I'll put maybe a couple more, a little different. Meanwhile, I'm on these mirrors.
Thanks again, to you soon Grazie a tutti del passaggio e dei commenti, sempre graditi.
Si, la foto reggeva anche senza gli specchi, forse era meglio.
La mia intenzione era di fare una foto surreale, la posizione della modella è quella che le avevo chiesto io. Nell'idea originale che avevo, negli specchi dovevano esserci altre parti di corpo, un po' come nella prima foto con gli specchi che ho messo tempo fa. Però l'effetto era solamente erotico e io volevo altro. Volevo dare l'idea di una donna imprigionata nella galleria, un fantasma che vaga sui binari e i particolari nello specchio devono aggiungere inquietudine.
Con gli specchi ne metterò forse un altro paio, un po' diverse. Intanto ragiono su questi specchi.
Grazie ancora, a presto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
