What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 04, 2018 (17:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great, great job. Fantastica, lavoro ottimo. |
| sent on July 05, 2018 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful, congratulations! :-) Davvero splendida, complimenti! |
| sent on July 05, 2018 (16:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations a nice macro, really good sharpness and beautiful colors. Hello Peter Complimenti una bella macro, nitidezza davvero ottima e bei colori. Ciao Pietro |
| sent on July 12, 2018 (15:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A pretty good job considering the large number of shots taken. We need to give you a round of applause only for the patience that you use to arrive at the end, I would not be able, besides I would tear my hair that I have not thinking that maybe at the last shot not to say the last, just a simple blow of wind or a small movement of Subject to frustrate minutes of work. I'd be crying. Un lavoro niente male considerando il notevole numero di scatti eseguiti. Occorre farvi un applauso solo per la pazienza che impiegate ad arrivare alla fine, io non ne sarei capace, oltretutto mi strapperei i capelli che non ho pensando che magari al penultimo scatto per non dire l'ultimo, basta un semplice colpo di vento o un piccolo movimento del soggetto per vanificare minuti di lavoro. Mi verrebbe da piangere. |
| sent on July 19, 2018 (9:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes Pier, it takes so much patience! :-D Beautiful moth and roost, good also light and composition. As for the detail you notice that there is, but in my way to see you could better cure the management of fusion artifacts. May I know what program you used for the stack? Eh si Pier, ci vuole tanta pazienza!! Bellissimi falena e posatoio, buona anche la luce e la composizione. Per quanto riguarda il dettaglio si nota che c'è, ma a mio modo di vedere potevi curare meglio la gestione degli artefatti di fusione. Posso sapere che programma hai usato per lo stack? |
| sent on July 19, 2018 (11:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sure Mars I used Helicon Focus, the trial version x 1 month.... that maybe nn TT has the requirements of the paid version Certo Mars ho usato helicon focus, la versione in prova x 1 mese....che forse nn ha tt i requisiti della versione a pagamento |
| sent on July 19, 2018 (12:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-/No, Helicon focus I never used it. But the "ugly" remains the alternative of a bit of a clone stamp in PS. :-D Greetings Marzio no, helicon focus non l'ho mai usato. Però alla "brutta" rimane l'alternativa di un pò di timbro clone in PS. Saluti Marzio |
| sent on July 19, 2018 (12:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok Marzio :-) Hello Luca Ok Marzio Ciao Luca |
| sent on August 08, 2018 (14:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent even this, without faults I would say I have helicon to pay (€70) and I answer pigi that is not a serious problem wrong one click since one of the 3 programs that has, you put in line alone photos according to an optimal evaluation and anyway removing it with 100 SCA TTI you would hardly notice the "void" out of focus certain that F 3.2 does not help in this case I always try a diaphragm that "accavalli the scans. If there is a reason to use a diaphragm so open tell me that there is always to learn, thank you very good optics that "Macrissimo! ottima anche questa, senza difetti direi Io ho Helicon a pagamento (70 €) e rispondo a PIGI che non è un problema grave sbagliare uno scatto poiché uno dei 3 programmi che ha, si mette in riga da solo le foto secondo una sua valutazione ottimale e comunque togliendola con 100 scatti difficilmente si noterebbe il "vuoto" fuori fuoco Certo che f 3,2 non aiuta in questo caso Cerco sempre un diaframma che "accavalli le scansioni. Se c'è un motivo per usare un diaframma cosi aperto ditemelo che c'è sempre da imparare, grazie Gran bell'ottica quel "macrissimo! PS per capire come "accavallare ho fotografato un righello longitudinalmente e si capische al volo quale diaframma conviene.Righello in metallo= meglio |
| sent on February 11, 2019 (19:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and curious. Awesome see these high magnification pics Bella e curiosa. Impressionante vedere queste foto ad alto ingrandimento |
| sent on February 12, 2019 (8:01) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
| sent on June 03, 2019 (13:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Martin, very kind Grazie Martin, gentilissimo |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |