What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 28, 2018 (10:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a great atmosphere (both ways). Che atmosfera fantastica (in entrambi i sensi). |
| sent on June 28, 2018 (22:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good on the first floor, but the high part for me compromised by a sun too burnt and by a WB too hot and tending to yellow that takes naturalness to the scene.
Surely live must have been a nice time.
Hello
Simone buono il primo piano ,ma la parte alta per me compromessa da un sole troppo bruciato e da un WB troppo caldo e tendente al giallo che toglie naturalezza alla scena.
sicuramente dal vivo deve essere stato un bel momento.
ciao
Simone |
| sent on June 29, 2018 (0:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sun too burnt? It counts that without fog you would have had an almost impossible backlight to solve. The heat is 90% Click, 10% post. Had it colder what sense it had? It was really all very hot and orange live, trust that it represents very reality and came out already so the shot, apart from some adjustment. Sole troppo bruciato? Conta che senza nebbia avresti avuto un controluce quasi impossibile da risolvere. Il calore è 90% scatto, 10% post. Averla avuta più fredda che senso aveva? Era davvero tutto molto caldo e arancio dal vivo, fidati che rappresenta molto la realtà ed è uscito già così lo scatto, a parte qualche aggiustamento. |
| sent on June 29, 2018 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It counts that without fog you would have had an almost impossible backlight to solve.
for me is the exact opposite, sure to hand things get complicated. Of course I would not have taken to F9, but to F16 to tighten the ball of the sun and look for the classic starlet. This one with clean sky.
with Fog the reflections and reverbs are amplified without a tripod and hard brakes get a photo ready ASAP.
for the hue of the WB you see that your reflex has recorded that, nothing forbids to change it in camera raw. It's the yellow/green hue that I don't find very photogenic.
But its clear, are my taste and my feelings, if you feel satisfied with the shot do well to leave it like that.
Hello Conta che senza nebbia avresti avuto un controluce quasi impossibile da risolvere.
Per me è l'esatto contrario, certo a mano le cose si complicano.certo non avrei scattato a f9, ma a f16 per stringere la palla del sole e cercare la classica stellina.questo con cielo pulito.
Con la nebbia i riflessi e i riverberi si amplificano senza cavalletto e braketing difficile ottenere una foto pronta da subito.
C'è da dire comunque che con un 28mm è impossibile ottenere un cerchio solare poco.ingombrante.
Per la tonalità del wb si vede che la tua reflex ha registrato quello, nulla vieta di modificarlo in camera raw.è la tonalità giallo/verdino che non trovo molto fotogenico.
Ma sia chiaro ,sono i miei gusti e le mie sensazioni, se ti ritieni soddisfatto dello scatto fai bene a lasciarlo così.
Ciao |
| sent on July 08, 2018 (20:11)
I agree with Commissario about the sun. For the rest, it is a beautiful image!
Ann :)) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
