What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 18, 2018 (23:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Peter, I have seen several of your photos and I noticed that have been taken all with analogue machine, I assume are then scanned slides: I too have many but, at least for now, I have renounced the passage for the poor results obtained, known Instead of yours, especially the softer ones, are successful, but some are affected by an increase in contrast, a compression of the dynamic range, and are also affected by hair and various dots. The photo of the rose, while being compositively very beautiful, at least for me, suffers a little ' all the defects listed so I recommend some intervention, as far as possible, in post-production Hello, Claudio :-P Ciao Pietro, ho visionato diverse delle tue foto e ho notato che sono state scattate tutte con macchina analogica, presumo siano quindi diapositive digitalizzate: anche io ne ho molte ma, almeno per ora, ho rinunciato al passaggio per gli scarsi risultati ottenuti, noto invece che le tue, soprattutto quelle più morbide, sono riuscite bene, alcune però risentono di un aumento del contrasto, di una compressione della gamma dinamica, e sono anche affette da peluzzi e puntini vari. La foto della rosa, pur essendo compositivamente molto bella, almeno per me, risente di un po' tutti i difetti elencati quindi ti consiglierei qualche intervento, per quanto possibile, in postproduzione Ciao, Claudio |
| sent on July 19, 2018 (0:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For the dust dots, I exclude the optics are well looked after and not or noticed dust inside or outside. To me I just have an impression, that at the moment that are scannerizzate.si I have to intervene with the air canister for each slide. And at least even at the Scan. Hello Peter Per i puntini di polvere ,escludo le ottiche sono ben curate e non o notato polvere interna o esterna.a me mi da solo un'impressione,che al momento che vengono scannerizzate.si devo intervenire con la bomboletta ad aria per ogni DIAPOSITIVA.e perlomeno anche alla scansione.ciao pietro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |