What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 18, 2018 (18:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good shooting point. To correct the slight slope to DX. To evaluate the cloning of the street lamp on the left and the corner of the roof to the right that disturb. In the pre-shot you could overexpose at least 1/3 stop. Tip: Prefer to shoot with less hard light. Imho
Hello, Lauro Buono il punto di ripresa. Da correggere la leggera pendenza a dx. Da valutare la clonatura del lampione a sx e dell'angolo del tetto a dx che disturbano. Nel pre-scatto si poteva sovraesporre almeno di 1/3 di stop. Consiglio: Da preferire scattare con luce meno dura. (imho)
Ciao, lauro |
| sent on June 18, 2018 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Lauro. I did not notice the lamppost and the roof on the left and right of the photo. Surely they must be cloned, because they disturb. Recheck the slope.
In Fact this photo is the result of a bracketing, starting from a RAW file and creating the two copies over and under exposed about 1 stop of the first.
The light was 11 a.m.
Nice to receive proactive comments.
Soon,
Corrado Grazie Lauro. Non avevo fatto caso al lampione e al tetto sulla SX e DX della foto. Sicuramente vanno clonate, perchè disturbano. Ricontrollo la pendenza.
In realtà questa foto è la risultanza di un bracketing, partendo da un file RAW e creando le due copie sovra e sotto esposte di circa 1 stop della prima.
La luce era quella delle 11 del mattino.
Bello ricevere commenti propositivi.
A presto,
Corrado |
| sent on June 18, 2018 (19:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Lauro, for the slope I have double checked. I based myself on the roof of the church that I was facing and reasonably straight. If you look at the house on the right, it looks leaning to the right, but it really isn't exactly straight compared to my position. So if I take that as a reference, I get all the way to the left. Is that what you meant? Thank you very much.
Hello, Corrado Ciao Lauro, per la pendenza ho ricontrollato. Io mi sono basato sul tetto della Chiesa che avevo di fronte e ragionevolmente dritto. Se invece guardi la casa sulla destra, essa sembra pendente a destra, ma in realtà non è esattamente dritta rispetto alla mia posizione. Quindi se la prendo a riferimento, mi sballa poi tutto a sx. Era questo che intendevi? Grazie Mille.
Ciao, Corrado |
| sent on June 18, 2018 (19:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is a light but palpable slope (0.25 °), if this is not the result of a crop risk, however, to cut the tip of the bell tower if you try the right. Lateral distortions may depend on a legega component of drooping lines and the type of construction.
Controll instead if you have used a polarizing filter is not because they are visible vignettes in the corners (the upper). If you are, point to a quality low-profile filter (ring). Declare that it is the union of 2 shots with supra and underexposure but honestly I do not see the shadows closed, with static situations like this try to run breacketing of at least 5 shots. ;-) (IMHO). Hello, Lauro E' una pendenza leggera ma palpabile (0,25°) , se questo non è risultato di un crop rischi però di tagliare la punta del campanile se tenti il radrizzamento. Le distorsioni laterali possono dipendere da una leggera componente di linee cadenti e dal tipo di costruzione.
Controlla invece se hai usato un filtro polarizzatore non consono perchè sono visibili delle vignettature negli angoli (quelli superiori). Se sì, punta su un filtro a basso profilo (ring) di qualità. Dichiari che è l'unione di 2 scatti con sovra e sotto esposizione ma onestamente vedo le ombre chiuse , con situazioni statiche come questa prova ad eseguire breacketing di almeno 5 scatti .  (imho). Ciao, lauro |
| sent on June 18, 2018 (21:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok. Thank you very much. Surely I have to work better in post, for vignetting I'm afraid it is precisely the goal. 24-105 F/4 Canon. I have no polarizing filter, for now
as SW I have used Photoshop elements, it is perhaps not much.
Hello. See you soon Ok. Grazie Mille. Sicuramente devo lavorare meglio in post, per la vignettatura ho paura che sia proprio l'obiettivo. 24-105 F/4 Canon. Non ho filtro polarizzatore, per ora
Come SW ho usato photoshop elements, non è forse un granchè.
Ciao. A presto |
| sent on June 18, 2018 (22:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But is it compatible with Photoshop elements? I searched Quache info on the net but everything was pointing on Photoshop CC MA è compatibile con Photoshop elements? Ho cercato quache info in rete ma tutto puntava sul photoshop CC |
| sent on June 18, 2018 (22:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, compatible but you have to download it quickly ;-)
Here all the history
Https://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=446295&show=1 Si, compatibile ma devi scaricarla in fretta
Qui tutta la cronistoria
www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=446295&show=1 |
| sent on June 19, 2018 (19:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Elleemme, I downloaded the Nik collection, it also works in elements 2018 and... you opened a world for me!
say cool, it's little.
Now I can also remove or even reduce vignetting.
Thanks again. Grazie Elleemme, ho scaricato la Nik collection, funziona anche in Elements 2018 e... mi hai aperto un mondo!
Dire figata, è poco.
Ora posso anche rimuovere o ridurre anche le vignettature.
Grazie ancora. |
| sent on June 19, 2018 (20:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For the reduction of digital noise (D-Fine) do it manually by using simple brushes smaller as you approach the contours of the subjects. Then apply it only in the background 8-) Per la riduzione del rumore digitale (D-Fine) falla manualmente usando via via pennelli sempe più piccoli man mano che ti avvicini ai contorni dei soggetti. Applicala quindi solo sullo sfondo  |
| sent on June 28, 2018 (21:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Elleemme. Sorry in the delay of the reply, but I worked on some shots made at the 3x3 basketball tournaments that you are holding in Milan, interesting and entertaining experience, but also difficult. I'm getting familiar with the Nik collection and plan to use Photoshop elements better.
on this photo, instead I proceeded to eliminate the disturbances and to remove the vignetting with the Nik.
Good light
Corrado Grazie Elleemme. Scusa nel ritardo della risposta, ma ho lavorato su alcuni scatti fatti a dei tornei di basket 3x3 che si sta tenendo a Milano, esperienza interessante e divertente, ma anche difficile. Sto prendendo confidenza con la Nik collection e piano piano ad usare meglio photoshop elements.
Su questa foto, invece ho provveduto ad eliminare i disturbi e a togliere la vignettatura con la Nik.
Buona Luce
Corrado |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
26.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
