RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Untitled Photo

 
Untitled Photo...

Valgardena

View gallery (19 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on August 30, 2011 (15:21) by Galdor. 10 comments, 839 views.

, 15 sec f/3.5, ISO 3200, tripod.

Via Lattea sul Sassolungo Pentax K-7





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on September 15, 2011 (13:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice, maybe a little noisy but remediable ... shooting data? Hello M.

avatarjunior
sent on September 15, 2011 (13:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto marksp, in fact the preview and 'much more' beautiful and defined!
hello

avatarjunior
sent on September 15, 2011 (15:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Unfortunately K7 at iso 3200 with M50 f1, 7 to 15 seconds.
Noise Reduction I have already made. More is a nice mash.
If I had the K5 ...

avatarjunior
sent on September 16, 2011 (12:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think it's more a matter of blurring and noise, if I used an f2.8 with 30 seconds would come :) spectacular in any case congratulations!

avatarjunior
sent on September 16, 2011 (14:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

J.army Hello, thanks for the ride.
Unfortunately it is not as you say.
The truth is blurred in the movement of the stars. to f1, 7 with the 50mm and 15 seconds of laying the stars have already moved.
Use f2, 8 and 30 seconds would have only made things worse. I should calculate the maximum time for the focal length and used for the portion of sky framed to prevent shaking stellar.
Then the iso 3200 K7 when the light there are really noisy.
But sooner or later going back to remake them! hehehe
:-D

avatarsenior
sent on September 16, 2011 (14:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

no no good definition, stars without halos and "roundness" due only to movement. ;) Tip: for photos of large fields (such as the Milky Way in Sagittarius, Fissure of Cygnus constellation with stars in relief) if you want a single shot is much much better than a 30 "at ISO 1600 that a 15" 2500 or 3200. with wide-field motion stellar hardly notice, the
noise instead ... and if you do not put more then the chief is difficult to eliminate. however good, excellent composition ;)

avatarjunior
sent on September 17, 2011 (9:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Dexter!
The alignment of multiple photos, however, I believe that we can only do this if the field does not include static subjects I guess.
The problem is that 30 seconds of installation with a 50mm on aps-c stellar motion is very clear, but I did shoot at ISO 800 or 1600 for 30 seconds with 18mm but I did not get great results.
I have yet to try between 2-300 photos I took that has succeeded better or less worse if we want to.

avatarsenior
sent on September 17, 2011 (15:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I had not noticed the focal length. unfortunately good results with just the camera will get you on the great fields ... to enlarge more you're forced to pair with a telescope tracker. for the sum of images, if you want to introduce the profile of something earth just take a picture and make a mask with added PS ;)

avatarsupporter
sent on July 04, 2012 (0:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree with Galdor noise in 3200 with the K7 (I owned until a few months ago before moving to K5 to 3200 I can assure you that is another story), however, is still a nice shot. :-P ;-):-P

avatarjunior
sent on July 12, 2014 (14:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'm not entirely convinced that the stars are fire; focheggiato like you?
Evocative image but '.

Hello
Stefano




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me