What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 23, 2018 (9:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The problem is that there is too much confusion, you do not understand what the lady should take, perhaps a little closer framing, to exclude the blurred woman, would help this portrait set.
The title does not make sense, the blurred woman looks in the car, shut up and therefore certainly does not interact with the woman in the foreground, so you do not understand who advises who Il problema è che c'è troppa confusione, non si capisce cosa debba prendere la signora, forse un'inquadratura un po' più stretta, da escludere la donna sfuocata, aiuterebbe questo ritratto ambientato.
Il titolo non ha senso, la donna sfuocata guarda in macchina, sta zitta e quindi certamente non interagisce con la donna in primo piano, quindi non si capisce chi consiglia a chi |
| sent on June 23, 2018 (12:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The beauty of this picture in my opinion is precisely the confusion, the blurred woman is an integral part of the composition (I have others where there is, but in my opinion from that something more).
You see very well that the girl in the foreground looks at the window and the one behind the is advising..
A closer shot would be a trivial portrait set while so tells a story at least in my opinion.
A greeting Luca Il bello di questa foto secondo me é proprio la confusione, la donna sfocata fa parte integrante della composizione ( ne ho altre dove non c'è , ma secondo me da quel qualcosa in più).
Si vede benissimo che la ragazza in primo piano guarda la vetrina e quella dietro la sta consigliando..
Una inquadratura piu stretta sarebbe stato un banalissimo ritratto ambientato mentre così racconta una storia almeno secondo me .
Un saluto Luca |
| sent on June 23, 2018 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quotas You can see very well that the girl in the foreground looks at the window and the one behind her is advising.. /QUOTE
and from what do you see it? Look in the car and you smile, there is no interaction between the two women, one looks at you the other looks at some objects.
would have been trivial but at least it would have made sense.
" Si vede benissimo che la ragazza in primo piano guarda la vetrina e quella dietro la sta consigliando.. "
E da cosa lo vedi? guarda in macchina e ti sorride, non c'è interazione fra le due donne, una guarda te l'altra guarda alcuni oggetti.
Sarebbe stato banale ma almeno avrebbe avuto un senso.
|
user117231 | sent on June 23, 2018 (13:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But no Mario... the other is not looking at the photographer who snaps...
is just squinting!!! ;-)
Rather I opened the HIGH version. Res...
had better not have done it. Ma no Mario...l'altra non sta guardando il fotografo che scatta...
è solo strabica !!! 
Piuttosto ho aperto la versione HIGH.RES...
era meglio che non l'avessi fatto. |
| sent on June 23, 2018 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And why?
E perché?
|
user117231 | sent on June 23, 2018 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
.. Quality.. ..qualità.. |
| sent on June 23, 2018 (17:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And what does it mean that there is no? is
out of focus or move? E cosa vuol dire che non c'e?
É fuori fuoco o mossa? |
user117231 | sent on June 23, 2018 (18:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
.. Very low image quality.. ..bassissima qualità d'immagine.. |
| sent on June 23, 2018 (21:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But why do you think? Ma per quale motivo secondo te? |
| sent on June 23, 2018 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion because there is not even a sharp point and the grain is the master Secondo me perché non c'è neanche un punto nitido e la grana la fa da padrone |
| sent on June 23, 2018 (22:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But grit at ISO 400... I don't understand... Maybe I was wrong the MAF Ma grana a 400 iso... Non capisco... Forse ho sbagliato la maf |
| sent on June 24, 2018 (2:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems to me micromoved, more than anything. For the rest, I agree with Mr. Mario, the image does not have a force, does not transmit anything, it is just confusing. A me sembra micromossa, più che altro. Per il resto, convengo con Il Signor Mario, l'immagine non ha una forza, non trasmette nulla, è solo confusionaria. |
user117231 | sent on June 24, 2018 (7:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
.. And on this point I go against the tide..
The image quality leaves much to be desired,
but I find that the elements inside the frame are well positioned. ..e invece io su questo punto vado controcorrente..
La qualità dell'immagine lascia molto a desiderare,
ma trovo che gli elementi dentro il fotogramma siano ben posizionati. |
| sent on June 24, 2018 (9:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
1/80 is the micromotion possible?
1/80 é possibile il micromosso?
|
| sent on June 24, 2018 (9:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But the low image quality to what is due?
is it possible that exporting to full resolution has had some problems? Or did I do something wrong?
looking at it on my PC does not seem to me that the quality is so low...
Cmq Thanks to all of the interventions
Good Sunday Luca Ma la bassa qualità d'immagine a cosa é dovuta?
É possibile che esportandola a piena risoluzione abbia avuto qualche problema? O ho sbagliato qualcosa?
Guardandola sul mio pc non mi sembra che la qualità sia così bassa...
Cmq grazie a tutti degli interventi
Buona domenica Luca |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
42.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
