RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Bug...

Aspettando il macro...

View gallery (15 photos)

Bug sent on November 07, 2012 (18:23) by Aquilotto246. 14 comments, 1180 views.

, 1/20 ISO 400, tripod.

obiettivo montato al contrario con anello di inversione



View High Resolution 7.4 MP  

1 person like it: Sabrina73


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on November 07, 2012 (18:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The first time that use a ring reversal

avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2012 (19:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Shooting is not easy given the equipment, but for these shots I recommend the extension tubes, you have the advantage of maintaining control of the diaphragm. Hello Ivan

avatarjunior
sent on November 07, 2012 (19:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Ivan, I bought some extension tubes and have not yet arrived, I took those cmq I am without contacts, then the iris lose him anyway.
With the objective inverted I have the advantage, compared to pipes, not to lose brightness.

do not you think?

avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2012 (19:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

View Aquilotto246 I use extension tubes (with the contacts) and the loss of light is very limited ... ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on November 07, 2012 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I hope so!
as using the lens on the contrary I like it but at the same time I'm afraid to break it. When I arrive the pipes will try and let you know (bloccherò the diaphragm to its maximum opening).

PS I did not buy the ones with the contacts at the same price because we bought a macro lens used (there is a spending review) :-).

avatarjunior
sent on November 09, 2012 (1:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

do not preocupare the goal will not break I will use in this manner for 3 years and a half ;-) ;-) why photographers the insect inside the box? is not better than a natural background not just in it for you ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on November 09, 2012 (13:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You're absolutely right, in fact the next step is to go to photograph insects in their natural habitat.
For now I'm just experimenting at home, to learn how to make macro pictures.
In this respect, I tell you, because I really like your photos, any advice I give will be appreciated and put in place (equipment available permitting).

avatarsenior
sent on November 09, 2012 (15:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the loss of light is very limited ...


nothing dramatic ... but it depends on how long the extension ... ;-)

avatarmoderator
sent on November 09, 2012 (19:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I did not buy the ones with the contacts at the same price because we bought a macro lens used

Find a macro lens used less than 103 euro? .. cost of a set of rings with contacts Phottix?? 8-)
Experiment, in my opinion, to be redone for these reasons:
-Mancaza sharpness
-Glass image
Perch-antropicoò
-Noisy
Question: the animal that you have taken was alive?
hello and good light, laurel

avatarjunior
sent on November 10, 2012 (1:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Lauro,
First you reassured on the health status of the bug ;-) (even if you do not deny that I hate), and macro lens for the price used on ebay I assure you that I followed the auction of a Tamron 90 mm macro ended at 160/150 euro but used rather not take it, I would rather buy the same goal, again I found a 320 euro.
Before tackling such an expense, which I assure you is high for me, I prefer to buy a ring inversion at the price of 7.90 € and extension tube (without contacts) at a price of 5.00 euro, to see if they able to achieve macro shots.
If you look at the other pictures I posted you will see that the only ring inversion are already improved, I guess.
As regards the defects of the hole that I have listed, now me them stuDiero and try to eliminate them.
Thank you.

I'll leave you with a question: better an egg today or a hen tomorrow? ...
Hello, Mino.

avatarmoderator
sent on November 10, 2012 (10:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

There are 5 alternatives Mino:
-Who spends more spend less
-The photographer with what you have
-They take the extension tubes to contacts
-You take a macro lens used by reputable sellers
-You take a Raynox Macro Converter (70 € approx)
www.raynox.co.jp/english/dcr/dcr250/indexdcr250eg.htm
:-D

avatarmoderator
sent on November 10, 2012 (11:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

wow! 8-)

avatarsenior
sent on November 10, 2012 (12:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Macro Raynox converter


I this and I can confirm you that a judgment more than good, even considering the expense, not only allows you to take the first steps, but when you have a macro lens can further maximize the potential (same goes for the extension tubes) ;-)

-Who spends more spend less
-The photographer with what you have


of course confirm this too ... 8-)

avatarjunior
sent on November 10, 2012 (22:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

it takes very little I have the extension tube homemade ;-) and a good old goal (to the diaphragm adjustable by hand) and the desire ..... you can do some decent shooting like my ;-)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me