What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 10, 2018 (14:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
is equal to Samuel L. Jackson!!!! È uguale a Samuel L. Jackson!!!! |
| sent on June 11, 2018 (5:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And when I told him I said "I wish my agent will get me the same roles" :-D Si e quando glielo ho detto mi ha risposto "I wish my agent will get me the same roles"  |
| sent on July 05, 2018 (14:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quotas is equal to Samuel L. Jackson!!!! /QUOTE
True, awesome! " È uguale a Samuel L. Jackson!!!! "
vero. impressionante! |
user28347 | sent on September 06, 2018 (20:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't know what diaphragm you used but I think the best in the series non so che diaframma hai usato ma mi pare la migliore della serie |
| sent on September 06, 2018 (20:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The diaphragm is written in the card. The reason? A quicker fall-off on the face given by court strip box to create a fast transition between the main light lasts and the shadows. The detail given by that closure enhances the textures of the skin giving a more experienced effect adding drama to its expression. You don't get that effect with an umbrella or a regular softbox. And you must be able to play with the inverse square law of light Il diaframma è scritto nella scheda. Il motivo? Un fall-off più rapido sul volto dato da strip box corte per creare una veloce transizione tra la main light dura e le ombre. Il dettaglio dato da quella chiusura esalta le texture della pelle dando un effetto più vissuto aggiungendo drammaticità all sua espressione. Non ottieni quell'effetto con un ombrello o un normale softbox. E devi saper giocare con la inverse square law della luce |
user28347 | sent on September 06, 2018 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I noticed now is out the inscription F11 and in fact I imagined that seemed to closed the diaphragm, apart from the lights that I do not understand anything. That strange, in general I always see diaphragms open for the blur on the site, but apparently I like them more and more when closed, Maybe some fashion is there, you say? ;-) mi sono accorto ora è uscita la scritta f11 e infatti immaginavo che sembrava chiuso il diaframma ,a parte le luci che non ci capisco niente .che strano ,in generale vedo sempre diaframmi aperti per lo sfocato sul sito ,ma a quanto pare mi piacciono sempre di più quando è chiuso,forse un po di moda c'è ,che dici? |
| sent on September 06, 2018 (20:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A wide aperture is fashionable among amateurs and hobbyists because they ignore many determined on how the depth of field works. In the professional field in the studio you go from 5.6 to 11 depends on the subject, the target of the shot and the lights used. I personally do not fall almost never 3.2 in external: 90% is in focus (the remaining 10 and the customer's fault that was not stationary) the fuzzy is great as at F2 if you know what you do. The men in the studio tend to snap them with a more closed aperture. ;-) Un diaframma a tutta apertura va di moda tra gli amatori e hobbisti perché ignorano molte determinati su come funziona la profondità di campo. In ambito professionale in studio si va da 5.6 a 11 dipende dal soggetto, dalla destinzione dello scatto e dalle luci utilizzate. Personalmente non scendo quasi mai 3.2 in esterna: il 90% è a fuoco (il restante 10 e colpa del cliente che non era fermo) lo sfocato è ottimo come a f2 se sai quello che fai. Gli uomini in studio tendo a scattarli con diaframma più chiuso. |
user28347 | sent on September 06, 2018 (20:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you ;-) perfect grazie perfetto |
user55404 | sent on September 06, 2018 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful portrait... and always very exhaustive your explanations... Congratulations Andrea
a salutone
Ciaoo Splendido ritratto... e sempre molto esaurienti le tue spiegazioni... complimenti Andrea
Un salutone
Ciaoo |
| sent on September 06, 2018 (20:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful portrait and very interesting explanations
compliments and applause
by Ep
Claudio C meraviglioso ritratto e spiegazioni molto interessanti
complimenti e applausi
da Ep
claudio c |
| sent on September 06, 2018 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and full of personality.... :-) bello e pieno di personalita'.... |
| sent on September 07, 2018 (4:53) | This comment has been translated
Thank you all! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
