What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 03, 2018 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent result. Hello. Ottimo risultato. Ciao. |
| sent on June 03, 2018 (22:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you dearly. Unfortunately bad seeing and so too much noise. Hopefully in the next few evenings..... Grazie carissimo. Purtroppo pessimo seeing e quindi troppo rumore. Speriamo nelle prossime serate..... |
| sent on June 04, 2018 (0:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Never seen Jupiter with this definition! Congratulations indeed! Hello Angel Mai visto Giove con questa definizione! Complimenti davvero! Ciao Angelo |
| sent on June 04, 2018 (16:02) | This comment has been translated
Fantastic! |
| sent on June 04, 2018 (16:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gio, too good. I like to mention that that red spot is actually a huge cyclone (as big as three times the Earth) that rotates continuously for about 300 years. Grazie Gio, troppo buono. Mi piace ricordare che quella macchia rossa è in realtà un enorme ciclone (grande come tre volte la Terra) che ruota ininterrottamente da circa 300 anni. |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (1:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How many frames are there? Unfortunately this kind of photos is totally influenced by seeing, in fact in some parts of Italy it makes no sense to even try quanti frame sono? purtroppo questo genere di foto è totalmente influenzato dal seeing, infatti in alcune zone dell'italia non ha senso neanche provarci |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (7:43) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (9:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Daomao, I used 25 percent good of about 8000 frames. The movie lasted 2 and a half minutes, as you know it's about the maximum limit to not bring up the rotation of the planet. In addition to seeing insufficient, the definition is lacking even for having to resample the image because too small for Juza (which accepts minimum 1000 pixels of the side). Maybe it was better if I left her small and add a frame..... Daomao, ho usato il 25 percento buono di circa 8000 frames. Il filmato durava 2 minuti e mezzo che come saprai è circa il limite massimo per non far apparire la rotazione del pianeta. Oltre al seeing insufficiente, la definizione è carente anche per aver dovuto ricampionare l'immagine perché troppo piccola per Juza (che accetta minimo 1000 pixel di lato). Forse era meglio se la lasciavo piccola e aggiungevo una cornice..... |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (9:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Marcophotographer, very kind. Grazie Marcophotographer, gentilissimo. |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (12:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ah maybe the color banding that I saw at the top was due to resampling, ph I reckon he's not doing well in these cases. I recommend you try Photozoom Pro 7, currently I think has the best resampling, going on S-spline Max > photo detailed and next you can change some interesting value 2000 best frames are still quite a few, maybe he does some tests with some Different setting with 4000 frames or 700, from what I've seen on the Internet these programs change results with few things or even just changing stacking program ah forse il color banding che vedevo in alto era dovuto al ricampionamento, ph mi sa che non se la cava bene in questi casi. ti consiglio di provare photozoom pro 7, attualmente credo abbia il miglior ricampionamento, andando su s-spline max>foto dettagliata ed accanto si può cambiare qualche valore interessante 2000 best frames sono comunque parecchi, magari fa delle prove con qualche impostazione differente con 4000 frames o 700, da quel che ho visto su internet questi programmi cambiano risultato con poche cose o anche solo cambiando programma di stacking |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (13:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Dao, I will follow your directions. In fact I realize that, although someone liked it, I would have to wait to have a better photo before publishing it. I got dragged by the onset of the new CCD camera..... ;-) Grazie Dao, seguirò le tue indicazioni. In realtà mi rendo conto che, nonostante sia piaciuta a qualcuno, avrei dovuto aspettare di avere una foto migliore prima di pubblicarla. Mi sono fatto trascinare dall'esordio della nuova camera CCD..... |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hey mark, Bell upgrade Setup!!! ;-) :-D I'm also meditating a change for planetary and lunar shooting... how do you find co this 224 in color?? Hey Marco, bell upgrade di setup!!! anche io sto meditando un cambio per le riprese planetarie e lunari...come ti trovi co questa 224 a colori?? |
| sent on June 05, 2018 (14:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Leo, actually I have not changed CCD but I joined the ASI120mono. For the moon I think is better monochrome while the planets in shades of gray are really sad.... I wanted to buy the new ASI120MC but then I found a 224 used at the same price and I took advantage. It seems very good, but I have no terms of comparison with other rooms... Ciao Leo, in realtà non ho cambiato CCD ma l'ho affiancata alla ASI120mono. Per la Luna ritengo sia meglio la monocromatica mentre i pianeti in toni di grigio sono veramente tristi.... Volevo comprare la ASI120MC nuova ma poi ho trovato una 224 usata allo stesso prezzo ed ho approfittato. Mi sembra molto buona, ma non ho termini di paragone con altre camere... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |